Re: Samba problem needs translation
- From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:15:32 +0000
On Friday 10 March 2006 19:46, Craig White wrote:
which machine is set to use workgroup named MYDOMAIN.LAN ?That is not the workgroup name, it's a substitute. Reason? Long story, not
really relevant.
that doesn't sound like a samba box...that sounds more like a WindowsAll boxes, windows and linux boxes have the same workgroup name.
box that is trying to be a WINS server for that workgroup at the same
time your Samba box is in a different workgroup...just guessing
Probably easiest to have all computers on the LAN have the sameOK - so do you suggest that I have 'wins support = true' AND 'wins server =
workgroup name at which point samba using 'wins support = true' and an
OS level of say > 33 should effectively win all browsing elections and
cut down on the noise
192.168.0.30' (the samba server IP)?
Other boxes have OS level set to 33 and the server was set to 66, though when
I went to the slimmed down version recommended in 'Samba 3 by Example' that
was taken out. I'll put it back in.
Anne
Attachment:
pgpM2I4rrLzYg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Samba problem needs translation
- From: Craig White
- Re: Samba problem needs translation
- References:
- Samba problem needs translation
- From: Anne Wilson
- Re: Samba problem needs translation
- From: Anne Wilson
- Re: Samba problem needs translation
- From: Craig White
- Samba problem needs translation
- Prev by Date: Re: From release notes for FC5T3 (web)
- Next by Date: Re: Samba problem needs translation
- Previous by thread: Re: Samba problem needs translation
- Next by thread: Re: Samba problem needs translation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|