Re: slow FC4 to FC5 upgrade
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 13:43:22 +1030
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 07:28 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
Was the nodma option used because of mediacheck issues? Turning off
dma like that will kill hard disk performance as well as CD
performance.
I am curious as to why DMA might foul up mediacheck or installations,
but be okay once you have an installed system? I also wonder if, given
the long time involved, it'd be better to first do a mediacheck, then
reboot with DMA for the installation?
--
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: slow FC4 to FC5 upgrade
- From: Paul Howarth
- Re: slow FC4 to FC5 upgrade
- From: Jim Cornette
- Re: slow FC4 to FC5 upgrade
- References:
- slow FC4 to FC5 upgrade
- From: Jack Howarth
- Re: slow FC4 to FC5 upgrade
- From: Paul Howarth
- slow FC4 to FC5 upgrade
- Prev by Date: Re: FC5 mounting audio CD's [Solved]
- Next by Date: Re: Wireless adapter for FC5
- Previous by thread: Re: slow FC4 to FC5 upgrade
- Next by thread: Re: slow FC4 to FC5 upgrade
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
