Re: NX bit: AMD vs Intel?
- From: Jurgen Kramer <gtm.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:35:55 +0200
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 17:09 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 12:56 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:Yep, nx is there. Odd that it is only displayed on Intel systems.
On my Intel system (Xeon with EMT64 support) which runs the 32-bit
version of FC5 I can see that NX support is active (from dmesg):
NX (Execute Disable) protection: active
On my other system, a AMD64 system running the 64-bit version of FC4,
there is no message regarding NX support being enabled of disabled at
all.
Checking init.c in the kernel sources it seems that NX support is
depended on PAE support and NX support from the processor. As the AMD
processor supports both I aspect to see a NX procection active message
on my AMD system as well. Does NX support suppose to work on 64-bit
kernels ?
Both systems run kernel 2.6.16.
Jurgen
AFAICS, It's activated quietly if present on iAMD64 systems.
No printk code.
So, if /proc/cpuinfo includes nx, you're in the clear.
Thanks.
Jurgen
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- NX bit: AMD vs Intel?
- From: Jurgen Kramer
- Re: NX bit: AMD vs Intel?
- From: Gilboa Davara
- NX bit: AMD vs Intel?
- Prev by Date: Re: Wine segfaults in FC5 x86_64
- Next by Date: Re: USB hard drive
- Previous by thread: Re: NX bit: AMD vs Intel?
- Next by thread: Re: NX bit: AMD vs Intel?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|