Re: BUG: spinlock recursion
- From: Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 20:11:22 -0500
Bill Polhemus wrote:
Gilboa Davara wrote:
P.S. Please don't post in HTML. Thanks.
OFF TOPIC:
FWIW, I think that in this day and age, complaining about posting in HTML is patently ridiculous.
Have you read this?
http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml
Either set up your list to strip out the HTML--a common technology that's been around for years now--or just live with it.
Hey, don't come to our party and then tell us how to run it!
[snip]
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- BUG: spinlock recursion
- From: Gonzalo Aguilera
- Re: BUG: spinlock recursion
- From: Gilboa Davara
- Re: BUG: spinlock recursion
- From: Bill Polhemus
- BUG: spinlock recursion
- Prev by Date: Re: dual booting XP and Linux
- Next by Date: PCI-e rs232 card on linux
- Previous by thread: Re: BUG: spinlock recursion
- Next by thread: [OT] Re: BUG: spinlock recursion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
