Re: I give up on x86-64, its too busted.
- From: Rob Andrews <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:37:47 +0100
On 16-Apr-2006 14:43.13 (BST), Bill Polhemus wrote:
Is x86_64 appropriate for an AMD 64-bit processor? I thought there was a
distinction between Intel and AMD for 64 bits.
AMD's 64-bit processors are x86-64, often also referred to as amd64 and
polluted by Windows x86-64 releases as "x64". This moniker also applies
to CPUs with Intel's EM64T, hence later members of the Pentium 4 and
Xeon 4.
Intel's Itanium architecture is referred to as ia64.
--
rob andrews :: pgp 0xb35ff721 :: rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I give up on x86-64, its too busted.
- From: Gene Heskett
- Re: I give up on x86-64, its too busted.
- References:
- I give up on x86-64, its too busted.
- From: Gene Heskett
- Re: I give up on x86-64, its too busted.
- From: Bill Polhemus
- I give up on x86-64, its too busted.
- Prev by Date: odd cdrom issue in FC4
- Next by Date: SuperKaramba
- Previous by thread: Re: I give up on x86-64, its too busted.
- Next by thread: Re: I give up on x86-64, its too busted.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
