Re: cups relaying remote broadcasts to a local subnet

On Tuesday 23 May 2006 08:22, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Everyone,

I posted a request last week that I am still not able to solve. I am
unable to broadcast cups remote printer information to a local subnet
that is different than the external network card.

In looking at the cups examples I have not seen any example of this
capability so I am wondering if anyone else has made this work or is
this a design limit of cups.

Here is the example ip address obviously have been changed

"Remote A" 70.69.68.67 <-> "Remote C" 64.35.30.18

"Remote B" 64.70.99.20 <-> "Remote C" 64,35,30,18


Remote A is a two ethernet card gateway to a local network
Remote B is a one ethernet card gateway to a local network
Remote C is a two ethernet card gateway to a local network

Why are there two ethernet cards on A and C but only one on B?
If B is the portal to the internet, how does it connect to the router?
Doesn't it use an ethernet card for that? If so, how does it connect to
Remote C? That would also need an ethernet card

How does Remote A connect to the internet, does it route through Remote C to
Remote B or is it not supposed to?

Remote B has only one card because it is attached to an isp's router
that has NAT translation to a local subnet of 10.0.0.0

I am able to get broadcasted printer information into the local network
of Remote B, but not Remote A or Remote C. The difference obviously
being the fact that A and C have an internal and external ethernet
cards.


And how are those cards setup? Internal & external subnets to what?

When I look at the examples on the cups documentation or ESP
documentation I have not found any examples of a two network card
machine broadcasting to an internal subnet different than the external
subnet. There are examples of broadcasting to an internal subnet that
has the same subnet as the external card.

I would like to know if any of you have been able to make cups broadcast
remote printer information to an external ethernet card and then through
the internal ethernet card using a different subnet for a local network.
If this is possible I would sure like some help.

Thanks,

Greg Ennis

Please provide more information, thanks.

--
Tom Taylor
Linux user #263467
Federal Way, WA







--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: cups relaying remote broadcasts to a local subnet
    ... unable to broadcast cups remote printer information to a local subnet ... Remote A is a two ethernet card gateway to a local network ... How does Remote A connect to the internet, does it route through Remote C ...
    (Fedora)
  • cups relaying remote broadcasts to a local subnet
    ... unable to broadcast cups remote printer information to a local subnet ... Remote A is a two ethernet card gateway to a local network ... I would like to know if any of you have been able to make cups broadcast ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: cups relaying remote broadcasts to a local subnet
    ... unable to broadcast cups remote printer information to a local subnet ... Remote A is a two ethernet card gateway to a local network ... If B is the portal to the internet, how does it connect to the router? ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: How to enable split/full tunnel while VPNed??
    ... you cannot specify a default gateway in that case. ... so that you can still access the Internet. ... subnet route to the remote site. ... that it can route between the LAN subnet and your address pool subnet? ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: Routing internet traffic directly instead of through VPN
    ... When you setup the vpn tunnel, you specify a 'local' and 'remote' subnet. ... Anything that is not interesting is sent out to the internet, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)