Re: the safety of gnupg

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 22:37:39 +0930,
Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've just been reading some rather silly things about gnupg except for
one practical point: Who has actually checked the source code for it to
see whether it's trustworthy, etc?

And, of course, the next thing would be: Who would they be that we
could trust them, too? After a bit of Googling around, I'm darned if I
can find out, nor think of the right terms to search for.

gnupg is much less likely to have an intentional back door than anything you
get from a corporation.

Naturally, this extends to other open-source programs. Which ones do
get vetted?

The openbsd guys do security audits of programs.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: the safety of gnupg
    ... Who has actually checked the source code for it to ... see whether it's trustworthy, etc? ... it ought to be verified as safe. ... the mathematics of how to do PGP would seem to be considered as ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: FTS
    ... For the command ls, the source code is using FTS to ... in openBSD, and I was curious since I had never seen FTS before. ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)
  • Re: C Compiler Preprocessors
    ... how can i find out in my c source code if this is compiled on FreeBSD, ... NetBSD or OpenBSD? ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
  • Re: Source code for shell that processes an asterisk as a special symbol
    ... The source code for every shell is now freely available. ... Using with OpenBSD? ... See Dave's OpenBSD | X | KDE corner at ...
    (comp.unix.shell)