Re: [OT] routing
- From: Eric Brunson <brunson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:31:31 -0600
hicham wrote:
HelloI'm assuming pc B is supposed to be in network B? You aren't very clear
I have some basic questions on some network and routing issue
I need to setup two pc 's A and B acting as gateways
( running on Fedora )
assigned ip adress 10.3.5.223 for pc A and 10.3.4.225 for pc B
connected to a private lan network 10.3.0.0
now the subnet for the gateway A is a network 10.10.1.0 / 24 , gateway
A in this subnet got ip address 10.10.1.1
and subnet for gateway B is a network 10.20.1.0/24, gateway B ip
address is 10.20.1.1
and you picked horrible network numbers. From what I can see, neither
of the PC's is actually in either of your networks. With a netmask of
/24, all pcs in network A would need addresses that start with 10.10.1
and network B would need 10.20.1. Plus, gateways for any subnet need to
be in the same subnet of the PC's they are routing for.
Without a router with an interface (physical or virtual) on each
now I need to get a pc in subnet 10.10.1.0 / 24, communicate with a pc
in subnet 10.20.1.0/24, How do I achieve that ? thru a routing table
right ?
network, two devices can't talk to each other. That's the bottom line.
You can only talk directly to a device on your own network, if a device
is not on your network, then you have to talk to a gateway (router) that
is on your own network.
So, if you have two PCs that are on the same ethernet segment, but with
what do I need to fill in my route table in system-config-network ?
different IP networks, then you either have to have a router on that
ethernet segment, or plumb multiple IP addresses on each PC so they are
on the same networks.
Hopefully that makes sense. If you need more help, just send more
information.
Thanks for replying
hicham
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- [OT] routing
- From: hicham
- [OT] routing
- Prev by Date: Re: Madwifi not working with latest kernel upgrade, broken dependency.
- Next by Date: Re: Fedora Core 5 LDAP client authentication problem with Solaris 9 iPlanet LDAP Server
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] routing
- Next by thread: the safety of gnupg
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- Re: can an alias address be routed through?
... The other interface sis0 has an address of 192.169.1.254 with a subnet ... BUT
from the 192.169 network It still doesnt ... If i add a route ... In other
words, no matter what your netmask, your gateway ... (comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc) - Re: Could an ICMP Redirect have disconnected my server?
... yes - but you seem to have a strange network ... does a routing table
entry from an ICMP Redirect time out? ... systems with the same subnet number. ...
(comp.os.linux.networking) - Re: Cant figure out simple routing between 2 Windows domains
... I'm lost on how to get a very simple routing setup working for 2 ... floor I
have domain2.com with a subnet of 192.168.2.0/24. ... network together with the
cable running between them. ... You need one router with an interface in each network.
... (comp.dcom.sys.cisco) - Re: 2 different routes
... you're trying to route a subnet you're in through ... its gateway
-- that won't work the way you expect it to. ... gateway of the secondary public network
for things that came in on that ... (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc) - Re: Bridging interfaces
... The handbook section on routing is pretty basic and it seems ... A layer 2 bridge
connects two physical network segments to create the ... subnet sitting on top of
a layer 2 network. ... If you want a single layer 2 network, ... (freebsd-questions)