Re: /dev/tape
- From: Rick Stevens <rstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:37:00 -0700
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 17:31 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 17:19 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
After installing FC5, I don't see /dev/tape showing up as a symlinkLooking at this rule, you probably have something like /dev/tape-0
to /dev/nst0 anymore and it disappears after a reboot if I add one
manually to make mt and amanda work. The tape drive wasn't attached
when I installed - would that make a difference?
/etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules does have an entry:
KERNEL=="nst[0-9]", BUS=="scsi", SYMLINK+="tape-%k", MODE="0660"
and I do have /dev/nst0. Does it need something else?
instead of /dev/tape. The %k is replaced with the kernel number, so
that /dev/nst0 gets a /dev/tape-0 symlink. /dev/nst1 would get
/dev/tape-1, and so forth.
Actually it is making tape-nst0 -> nst0, but that doesn't help
much.
Change the rule to:
KERNEL=="nst[0-9]", BUS=="scsi", SYMLINK="tape%k", MODE="0660"
and I'll bet it works.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -
- VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- Veni, Vidi, VISA: I came, I saw, I did a little shopping. -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Re: /dev/tape
- From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: /dev/tape
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: /dev/tape
- Prev by Date: php
- Next by Date: Re: /dev/tape
- Previous by thread: Re: /dev/tape
- Next by thread: Re: /dev/tape
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
