Re: kde in extras - the devel discussion
- From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:42:46 -0500
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 10:26 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Well, whether you like it or not, Fedora leadership so far has not givenIMO, it's only a matter of time until somebody will screw KDE and
nobody will feel responsible - Up to now we all had RH's KDE maintainer
to blame, but then we won't have him.
I take it, then, you don't have much faith in Extras *at all*.
me much reason for faith in them ...
I'm sorry you feel that way. I'd love to hear what you think could be done
to improve things.
The sameNot quite. It's the size of KDE and its complexity is what makes the
argument can be made against everything in Extras.
difference - I strongly doubt a couple of "ambitious young man" will be
able to handle it.
I take it, then, as a challenge to remove your doubts.
Why? I said, *RH* is decoupling itself from what others consider a core3. It would close out RH from a technology
IMO, simply being in Extras != "close out RH from a technology"
1. RH != Fedora !!!
true! Which puzzles me why you mentioned it, because it appears to weaken
the original assertion even more.
component - If *they* think this is wise, ... well, I think they are in
error.
RH is free to choose whatever bits from Core, Extras (+others) to form RHEL.
2. There are no FE CDs.Coming soon! (Or at least a method to create customizable Fedora
installation media using your choice of bits from Core+Extras).
See above. I've read to many false promises from Fedora leadership to
give any trust in any such promise before I have it in my hands.
I think I see a trend here... you may be placing too much emphasis on Fedora
leadership (and "promises"), when in fact, much (most!) of the work/support
here needs to happen in the *community*.
-- Rex
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: kde in extras - the devel discussion
- From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: kde in extras - the devel discussion
- From: Andy Green
- Re: kde in extras - the devel discussion
- References:
- kde in extras - the devel discussion
- From: Mike Cohler
- Re: kde in extras - the devel discussion
- From: Paul Howarth
- Re: kde in extras - the devel discussion
- From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: kde in extras - the devel discussion
- From: Rex Dieter
- Re: kde in extras - the devel discussion
- From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: kde in extras - the devel discussion
- From: Rex Dieter
- Re: kde in extras - the devel discussion
- From: Ralf Corsepius
- kde in extras - the devel discussion
- Prev by Date: Re: FC5 & OpenOffice.org
- Next by Date: Re: what does this sendmail message in Logwatch showing? hacking?
- Previous by thread: Re: kde in extras - the devel discussion
- Next by thread: Re: kde in extras - the devel discussion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|