Re: nfs help?
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 17:34:34 +0930
Access rule are based on uid used on client at the mount time.
If you use root on client (for example) to mount an export, tipically
you can't access.
That's never been my experience. Firstly, normally only the root use
can mount something. Secondly, when mounting a Linux file system over
NFS, the original ownership is maintained, but numerically: User 500
remote is treated as user 500 local, so you better make sure that
usernames and user IDs match on both sides of the connection.
It is that I sayd.
For first, mount command is available also at user level.
While you *can* make things user-mountable, it doesn't also mean that
root mountable things will only be available to the root user. That
sort of behaviour depends on the mount. I would go as far as to say
that for things like NFS mounts, it's NOT typical to mount them as a
user, and it's NOT typical that users can't access root user mounted
The user level is threated everytime numerically.
When you use ls -la and see a user insted of a number is only because ls
make a conversion, but on ACL we ave numbers.
ls -lan would show numerical mounts (n option does that).
So, when you mount a NFS export into a linux machine and use ls -la you
are on a client, so ls convert numbers using local passwd and groups.
Typically, with NFS, user 500 has to be user 500 on both machines, and
so on. It doesn't matter if they use the same names on both sides, but
that helps to make things coherent.
If I am user 500, username Tim on one box, and export /home to another,
I really also want to be user 500, on the second box. Then, I can
access my files on both PCs. And, that mount is handled by root.
All that's done with just two entries on each machine (NFS must be
Server's /etc/export file:
This exports part of the file system to my LAN, the /home partition, and
each user within that file system's home directories get exported as-is
(Tim's files are Tim's elsewhere, johndoe's files are his elsewhere, and
Client's /etc/fstab file:
server.localdomain:/home /mnt/server/home nfs auto,intr,noexec,nodev
This mounts the export on a client machine. Root is doing the mount,
but because the individual directories are owned by other people, and
NFS understands ownership, ownership is maintained on both sides, so
long as you set up the client machines with the same user IDs on both
I seem to recall reading that it is possible to map user IDs between
different systems using NFS (e.g. on server Tim is 500, but Tim is 632
on a client, and 2349 on another client). But not seen anything
It's certainly possible doing that with Samba, but I find Samba to be
just bloody awful in other ways (slow, messy getting Samba to work as if
it were Linux, with proper Linux permissions, etc.).
Mikkel L. Ellertson:
Also, local root is normally mapped to user nobody on the remote
system unless the no_root_squash option in used. "man exports" for
normally root is squashed to very very non-priviledged user. And maybe
that on remote filesystem this special user are authorized to make
So the result is access denied or something else.
Only if the root user on a client tries to access files over on the
server as if it was still the root. It'll only get treated as the root
user locally. This stops someone who manages to exploit a client box
(which is easy enough) from exploiting a remote box without putting a
lot more effort into it.
Users can access their own remote files the same as they can their own
I think you need to provide configuration examples, as well as examples
of exactly what it is that you're trying to do. I suspect that you're
expecting a local root user, or process running as root, to have access
to files over the network.
(Currently running FC4, occasionally trying FC5.)
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
fedora-list mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Re: nfs help?
- From: Ambrogio
- Re: nfs help?