Re: FC4 or FC5



Alan M. Evans wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 10:44, Sean wrote:
Hah! What a confused piece of logic that is. The thing that
is really restricting you is the patented priprietary library!

No. Nothing in most proprietary licenses restrict them being linked into
programs containing parts with other licenses. The thing that restricts
this is the GPL. Your statement is patently false.

Incorrect. If you wish to do so, you may freely link a GPL'd work to a
proprietary one. You would not be allowed to redistribute that linked work
though. (You would still be permitted to redistribute the GPL-only component
if it could be reasonably and logically distinct from the proprietary work.)
Remember: The GPL is a copyright license. It only restricts the manners
in which users may modify and/or redistribute a given work. It does *not*
restrict usage. (And, in fact, if it did it would be non-Free.)


Please don't misunderstand. I don't have any real problem with the GPL.
It's just a license. That's ok. I do, however, see quite a few GPL
evangelists running about with a see-no-evil approach to their preferred
license. Stop for a moment and realize that, while the GPL may have some
real advantages, it also has some disadvantages. Pointing out those
disadvantages is not heresy.

Agreed.



--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
This message was sent through a webmail
interface, and thus not signed.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [FYI] QT4 licensing looks very bad for *BSD
    ... > the courts have consistently held that a Copyright holder can ... right holder can put pretty much any license terms they want onto something. ... (GPL clause #7) ... not redistribute GPL'ed code, they are not subject to the terms of the GPL. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Where can I buy Suse 9.2 Cds on the cheap
    ... redistribute any conglomeration of GPL code. ... The case for 'Open Source' ... license, it may be freely redistributable. ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: FC4 or FC5
    ... Nothing in most proprietary licenses restrict them being linked into ... The GPL is a copyright license. ... If there is no legal way around this, Suse Desktop will be a thing of the past ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: is there really no good gui builder
    ... "You must purchase a Qt Commercial License from Qt Software or from ... The GPL itself explicitly says this. ... that if you want to redistribute Qt with *restrictions* on the ... In fact, I don't think they are making such an interpretation, though ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Explanation of the GPL for Tony...
    ... It has been my observation that Tony just doesn't get the GPL - here is ... license in the IP world. ... The GPL is an example of a permission, ... Please note that your right to redistribute extends only to ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)

Loading