Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- From: Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:13:50 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 07:49 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
I don't see a solution there... Either a company patents it now as a
protective measure or they let someone else do it. Either way
it might end up owned by someone else later. What's the alternative?
Patent it, then put the patent into the Public Domain. That's what
Benjamin Franklin, who argued passionately against having patents
at all, used to do.
Is someone offering to cover the costs for that?
I thought you were looking for an alternative to simply patenting
something. It costs no more to put something into the Public Domain.
Today, patents only help large corporations. They are useless to the
small company and individuals.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- From: Craig White
- Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- References:
- Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- From: Keith G. Robertson-Turner
- Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- From: Kevin Kofler
- Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- From: Robin Laing
- Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- From: alan
- Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- From: Les Mikesell
- Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- Prev by Date: Re: Spam Filter
- Next by Date: Re: Spam Filter
- Previous by thread: Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- Next by thread: Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
