Re: ntpd vs selinux
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:17:00 +0930
Gene Heskett:
Jun 30 22:37:14 diablo ntpd[1936]: sendto(194.145.249.108): Invalid argument
Jun 30 22:38:01 diablo ntpd[1936]: sendto(194.102.249.64): Invalid argument
Jun 30 22:42:04 diablo ntpd[1936]: sendto(193.40.133.134): Invalid argument
Tim:
For what it's worth, I'd see the same sort of thing if NTP was run
twice. Don't ask how that might happen, I've not figured it out. If I
checked the running processes, killed off all the NTPDs then restarted,
it went away.
Gene Heskett:
I didn't kill any extra ntpd's. just a regular 'service ntpd restart'
Another thing that has that effect, that I'd forgotten about since
leaving dial-up internet, was an interface going down that NTP was
using. I had to put an NTP restart script into my ifup post PPP script,
to restart the NTP server after a new connection. It just wouldn't keep
on working by itself.
--
(Currently running FC4, occasionally trying FC5.)
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ntpd vs selinux
- From: Gene Heskett
- Re: ntpd vs selinux
- References:
- ntpd vs selinux
- From: Gene Heskett
- Re: ntpd vs selinux
- From: Tim
- Re: ntpd vs selinux
- From: Gene Heskett
- ntpd vs selinux
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem converting from eps to svg
- Next by Date: Configuring GRUB to boot FC-5-i386-DVD.iso
- Previous by thread: Re: ntpd vs selinux
- Next by thread: Re: ntpd vs selinux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|