Re: OT : No Flash 8 nor Flash 9 ?

On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 18:14 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On 7/3/06, Chris Mohler <cr33dog@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Talk:Flash_Player#Linux_Support

I've installed FF/Flash/Shockwave under wine with OK results.....

Man, I *hate* pages that require flash!


As do I. I am just happy that I didn't install Flash support for Konqueror.

Even worse, when running the 64 bit version of linux, the flash player
doesn't exist.


Chris

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list




--
To be updated...


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT : No Flash 8 nor Flash 9 ?
    ... I've installed FF/Flash/Shockwave under wine with OK results..... ... I *hate* pages that require flash! ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: OT : No Flash 8 nor Flash 9 ?
    ... > I've installed FF/Flash/Shockwave under wine with OK results..... ... I *hate* pages that require flash! ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: OT : No Flash 8 nor Flash 9 ?
    ... I've installed FF/Flash/Shockwave under wine with OK results..... ... I *hate* pages that require flash! ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: OT : No Flash 8 nor Flash 9 ?
    ... I've installed FF/Flash/Shockwave under wine with OK results..... ... I *hate* pages that require flash! ... Thanks Craig, it was so obvious that I did not think about it. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: OT : No Flash 8 nor Flash 9 ?
    ... I've installed FF/Flash/Shockwave under wine with OK results..... ... I *hate* pages that require flash! ... the only 1 that really bothers me is espn.com ...
    (Fedora)