RE: fedora-list Digest, Vol 30, Issue 16

Use FC3 or higher on Dell Poweredge Servers. I use the exact same setup you have and it works very well. Hardware raid will not work however.

I began with FC3 and since have since updated straight to FC5 nicely.

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 5:06 AM
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 30, Issue 16

Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: Which FC for a Dell poweredge server? (Graham Cossey)
2. Re: Which FC for a Dell poweredge server? (Anthony Messina)
3. Re: skype (luca porcu)
4. Re: skype (luca porcu)
5. how to create a vi macro (Jerin Jacob K)
6. Re: skype (Fran?ois Patte)
7. Re: skype (luca porcu)
8. Process memory question. (Dan Track)
9. Intel 3945ABG Wireless (Craig Preston)
10. Re: Intel 3945ABG Wireless (Andy Green)
11. Re: Intel 3945ABG Wireless (Craig Preston)
12. Re: Process memory question. (Andy Green)
13. Re: How to use Apache 2 with HTTPS only? (Vinicius)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:27:36 +0100
From: "Graham Cossey" <graham.cossey@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Which FC for a Dell poweredge server?
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<aed6dd610608020127q3cf53679r1836dc7b669f3b88@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 8/2/06, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Graham Cossey schrieb:

I'm thinking about FC4 but as this is a development/test server the
primary objective is that anything running on this MUST also run on
the live server installed with RH3 ES-13.8.3

I will of course ensure that the versions of PHP and MySQL etc match
the live server.

Probably it is then best to get CentOS 3, which is an RHEL3 "clone".
RHEL3 is based on ancient Red Hat Linux 9 and thus any Fedora release
will be more or less different.
Is the intended hardware RHEL3 certified? It then will run using CentOS
3 too.

I was wondering if older distros (like FC2 or those based on RH9)
would support the likes of SATA drives.


--
Graham



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:33:09 -0500
From: Anthony Messina <amessina@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Which FC for a Dell poweredge server?
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <44D06345.8090401@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Graham Cossey wrote:
On 8/2/06, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Graham Cossey schrieb:

I'm thinking about FC4 but as this is a development/test server the
primary objective is that anything running on this MUST also run on
the live server installed with RH3 ES-13.8.3

I will of course ensure that the versions of PHP and MySQL etc match
the live server.

Probably it is then best to get CentOS 3, which is an RHEL3 "clone".
RHEL3 is based on ancient Red Hat Linux 9 and thus any Fedora release
will be more or less different.
Is the intended hardware RHEL3 certified? It then will run using CentOS
3 too.

I was wondering if older distros (like FC2 or those based on RH9)
would support the likes of SATA drives.



i have 3 dell servers here, all poweredges: SC600, 800, 1800.
all run without problems with fc3-fc5.

--
Anthony
http://messinet.com
http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/14a5874d/signature.bin

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:37:24 +0200
From: "luca porcu" <thedjpig@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: skype
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<979e72a80608020137t5fbda272qc36a809764c5d531@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed


I tried this in my .asoundrc:

pcm.!card0 {
type plug
slave.pcm "dmixer"
}

pcm.dmixer {
type dmix
ipc_key 1024
slave {
pcm "hw:1,0"
period_time 0
period_size 1024
buffer_size 4096
rate 44100
}
bindings {
0 0
1 1
}
}

ctl.dmixer {
type hw
card 0
}

And it seems to work (just simple tests made). Maybe there is a better
solution? I don't know much about ALSA.

Hi,
repeat:

I use Skype with out .asoundrc or other configuration of dmix!

try skype with out .asoundrc!

lu


--
Il termine Hacker
Gli hacker sono delle persone dedicate all'elevato ideale di rendere
la tecnologia accessibile a tutti, persone dedite al culto della
bellezza e decise ad aiutare gli altri grazie alla potenza
tecnologica.
www.lucaporcu.com



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:37:24 +0200
From: "luca porcu" <thedjpig@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: skype
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<979e72a80608020137t5fbda272qc36a809764c5d531@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed


I tried this in my .asoundrc:

pcm.!card0 {
type plug
slave.pcm "dmixer"
}

pcm.dmixer {
type dmix
ipc_key 1024
slave {
pcm "hw:1,0"
period_time 0
period_size 1024
buffer_size 4096
rate 44100
}
bindings {
0 0
1 1
}
}

ctl.dmixer {
type hw
card 0
}

And it seems to work (just simple tests made). Maybe there is a better
solution? I don't know much about ALSA.

Hi,
repeat:

I use Skype with out .asoundrc or other configuration of dmix!

try skype with out .asoundrc!

lu


--
Il termine Hacker
Gli hacker sono delle persone dedicate all'elevato ideale di rendere
la tecnologia accessibile a tutti, persone dedite al culto della
bellezza e decise ad aiutare gli altri grazie alla potenza
tecnologica.
www.lucaporcu.com



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:11:26 +0530
From: Jerin Jacob K <jerinjacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: how to create a vi macro
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <1154508086.10690.25.camel@jerin>
Content-Type: text/plain

Hi all

I want to create a vi macro for "+y and "+gP commands . and it has to
work on visual mode of vi

i tried something like this but it is not working

:map c "+y
:map v "+gP

Waiting for your inputs ...
Regards,
Jerin Jacob






------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:12:57 +0530
From: Fran?ois Patte <francois.patte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: skype
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <44D06591.5000300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

luca porcu a écrit :

Hi,
repeat:

I use Skype with out .asoundrc or other configuration of dmix!

try skype with out .asoundrc!

In that case, it doesn't work! What is your /etc/asound.conf ?

--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Université Paris 5 - Paris
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte



------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:46:36 +0200
From: "luca porcu" <thedjpig@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: skype
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<979e72a80608020146y58698c08n121be89a95e97889@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

I use Skype with out .asoundrc or other configuration of dmix!

try skype with out .asoundrc!

In that case, it doesn't work! What is your /etc/asound.conf ?

Do you have set ALSA in the audio option ini skype?

# more /etc/asound.conf


#Generated by system-config-soundcard, do not edit by hand
#SWCONF
#DEV 0
defaults.pcm.card 0
defaults.pcm.device 0
defaults.ctl.card 0


--
Il termine Hacker
Gli hacker sono delle persone dedicate all'elevato ideale di rendere
la tecnologia accessibile a tutti, persone dedite al culto della
bellezza e decise ad aiutare gli altri grazie alla potenza
tecnologica.
www.lucaporcu.com



------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:16:11 +0100
From: "Dan Track" <dan.track@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Process memory question.
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<9d5ddd1f0608020216u57903966nb5389e222b85daad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hi

Could someone please help me find a way to find out how much memory a
process is using, my question relates specifically to the analog
running wild on my server.

Thanks
Dan



------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:44:57 +1000
From: "Craig Preston" <duffman23@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Intel 3945ABG Wireless
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID:
<6842681b0608020244y175712bctb80d78aa153a3922@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I have a laptop with an Intel 3945abg Wireless adaptor, and I'm having a
bugger of a time getting it working. Has anyone else got these going? I have
downloaded the linux drivers from the intel site and the ieee drivers. I am
having trouble getting the intel files to make. They fail with error 2. How
descriptive :)

Any help appreciated
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/95af3f02/attachment.html

------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:47:32 +0100
From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Intel 3945ABG Wireless
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <44D074B4.50403@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Craig Preston wrote:

I have a laptop with an Intel 3945abg Wireless adaptor, and I'm having a
bugger of a time getting it working. Has anyone else got these going? I
have downloaded the linux drivers from the intel site and the ieee
drivers. I am having trouble getting the intel files to make. They fail
with error 2. How descriptive :)

Any help appreciated

Yep I'm working good with the current ipw3945 stuff and current FC5
kernel. FWIW on the current kernel, I did not have to update the ieee
stuff IIRC.

Do you have kernel-smp-devel or kernel-devel package installed beforehand?

-Andy


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4492 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/f581c4f7/smime.bin

------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:57:56 +1000
From: "Craig Preston" <duffman23@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Intel 3945ABG Wireless
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<6842681b0608020257x7828a8cas719f587a20d34f13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Yes I had the kernel-dev package installed.

On 02/08/06, Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Craig Preston wrote:

I have a laptop with an Intel 3945abg Wireless adaptor, and I'm having a
bugger of a time getting it working. Has anyone else got these going? I
have downloaded the linux drivers from the intel site and the ieee
drivers. I am having trouble getting the intel files to make. They fail
with error 2. How descriptive :)

Any help appreciated

Yep I'm working good with the current ipw3945 stuff and current FC5
kernel. FWIW on the current kernel, I did not have to update the ieee
stuff IIRC.

Do you have kernel-smp-devel or kernel-devel package installed beforehand?

-Andy




--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/1b6b2be4/attachment.html

------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:00:35 +0100
From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Process memory question.
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <44D077C3.70004@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dan Track wrote:
Hi

Could someone please help me find a way to find out how much memory a
process is using, my question relates specifically to the analog
running wild on my server.

top

and then press

Shift-M

will give some idea.

You can get a buttload of good info on a particular process from its
Process ID number. Eg, for PID 18053

cat /proc/18053/status

Name: ekiga
State: S (sleeping)
SleepAVG: 97%
Tgid: 18053
Pid: 18053
PPid: 3249
TracerPid: 0
Uid: 500 500 500 500
Gid: 500 500 500 500
FDSize: 256
Groups: 14 500
VmPeak: 118920 kB
VmSize: 118432 kB
VmLck: 0 kB
VmHWM: 23592 kB
VmRSS: 23292 kB
VmData: 18504 kB
VmStk: 84 kB
VmExe: 900 kB
VmLib: 35996 kB
VmPTE: 220 kB
StaBrk: 081a2000 kB
Brk: 09571000 kB
StaStk: bfe32e20 kB
Threads: 10
SigQ: 0/20329
SigPnd: 0000000000000000
ShdPnd: 0000000000000000
SigBlk: 0000000000000000
SigIgn: 0000000000000000
SigCgt: 000000018c005ef3
CapInh: 0000000000000000
CapPrm: 0000000000000000
CapEff: 0000000000000000
Cpus_allowed: ffffffff
Mems_allowed: 1

For all these though, understand that shared libs get counted for every
process, exploding the total figures given for all processes compared to
actual global memory usage.

-Andy

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4492 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/10f62a2b/smime.bin

------------------------------

Message: 13
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 07:04:43 -0300
From: Vinicius <cviniciusm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: How to use Apache 2 with HTTPS only?
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <eaptca$dtp$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Tim escreveu:
Vinicius:
I did do "RedirectPermanent / https://myserver.com/";, but the site is
presenting an error.

Tim:
Which one? The redirecting HTTP one, or the HTTPS one they're directed
to?

You haven't answered the above. Which part of the server is presenting
the error.


It's in the past now. When I disabled the "Listen" and the
"RedirectPermanent" directives then both the server and the client are
working fine with HTTPS. The server is only serving HTTPS.


Both the server and the client use certificates issued by a local CA,
and I created a SSLRequire rule to allow only the client to enter the
site. I think the SSL check failed because of the RedirectPermanent.

More details needed. Server configuration, the specific redirection
rules, at least.


Vinicius:
Hello,

I did do the following:
1. created a CA certificate;
2. created a server certificate signed by the CA;
3. created a client certificate, CA as root; Imported it to Firefox;
4. created a "SSLRequire" rule to allow only this specific client to
enter the site. It checks the O, OU and the CN.
5. disabled the "Listen" Directive for HTTP.

In what way did you "disable" it? I seem to recall that if you don't
have one, you end up with defaults.

Now, I would like to use DAV, but the application DAVExplorer's
(DAVExplorerSSL.sh) authentication fails with the message: "Connection
error: javavx.net.ssl.SSLPeerUnverifiedException: peer not
authenticated". I have entered the address https://localhost/upload .

The snippet of httpd.conf regarding DAV:
"
<Directory /var/www/upload>
Dav On
AuthName "Top Secret"
AuthUserFile /var/davpasswd
AuthType Basic
</Directory>
"

I'd fix other problems before starting on a new one, but basic
authentication and HTTPS aren't compatible with each other.


I have heard that's possible to use DAV and SSL together.

Any ideas, pl'ease?


TIA,
Vinicius.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/21e88b16/signature.bin

------------------------------

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 30, Issue 16
*******************************************

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list