Re: Procedure to replace a NIC - PLEASE HELP!
- From: fredex <fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 21:20:13 -0400
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:31:43PM -0400, Steven Stromer wrote:
Robert L Cochran wrote:
Steven --I noticed on the Realtek site that there is no
downloadable driver for the 2.6 kernel.
http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloads1-3.aspx?lineid=1&famid=4&series=2003072&Software=True
Download the source code. Unzip the tarball.
There is a C program in the src directory that has to be corrected
before it will compile:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HARDWARE_RTL8168
From the r1000_v1.04 directory:
su
make
depmod -a
The module will build and install correctly with no changes to any of
the Makefiles.
Probably you will find the tulip driver has been erroneously loaded. Get
rid of it:
rmmod tulip
change to the correct /lib/modules.../net directory then
insmod r1000.ko
This should get the Realtek working.
One last bit of advice -- it took me about 15 minutes of Googling to
locate the links above. That was with time to sip coffee. I got my
Realtek 8168 gigabit adapter for PCIe running as soon as I did the
insmod, and I'm using it now to send this email. Why not try Google a
little more in the future?
Bob Cochran
The r8169 driver sounds like it might have its roots based on the 2.4
kernel. I would remove it (rmmod it) and change modprobe.conf to read
Slightly OT, but not much:
I'm running Centos 4.4 on a Gigabyte GA-7N400 Pro2 board. This board has
a builtin RTL8169 chip. When I do lsmod I get (among other things)
r8169 19913 0
lspci shows:
01:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10)
and "ethtool eth0" shows:
Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Speed: 100Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Port: Twisted Pair
PHYAD: 0
Transceiver: internal
Auto-negotiation: on
Link detected: yes
And FWIW, dmesg shows:
r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 1.2 loaded
ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:01:0b.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, high) -> IRQ 201
r8169: NAPI enabled
divert: allocating divert_blk for eth0
eth0: Identified chip type is 'RTL8169s/8110s'.
eth0: RTL8169 at 0xf8832000, 00:0d:61:3f:5f:c3, IRQ 201
Centos 4.4 is a 2.6 kernel (2.6.9-42.0.2.EL) (though an older one than
FC5 uses, I believe). I'm not running the network at gigabit speeds,
but it looks as if it would be expected to work, with that driver, were
I attempting it, based on the ethtool output.
So. My point is: I don't think the r8169 module is necessarily the wrong
one.
alias eth0 r1000
and reboot.
It would be useful to examine your dmesg output. I don't know how else
you have changed your network scripts. If my suggestion does not fix
your problem, send me your dmesg output as a text file attachment. You
can plug a USB flash drive in your machine and then
dmesg > /put the name of your usb drive here/dmesg.txt
I have several other things to do today, and may not be able to look
over your output till tonight, but I'll review it.
Bob
Bob,
Thank you for your help with my problem. I had changed modprobe.conf to
read 'alias eth0 r1000' when I last reported no success, so that hasn't
resolved the problem. I rmmod'ed the r8169 driver, but this seems to
remove it only until the system is rebooted. dmesg returns some
interesting output that may point us to the problem, but I am not able
to understand it fully. The pertinent part is as follows:
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:00:0f.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:00:07.5
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:00:0d.2
eth0: Identified chip type is 'RTL8169S/8110S'.
eth0: r10001.04, the Linux device driver for Realtek Ethernet
Controllers at 0xc800, 00:40:f4:ee:2f:ff, IRQ 11
BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
<c043dad5> softlockup_tick+0x90/0xa1 <c0423d50>
update_process_times+0x35/0x57
<c0406134> timer_interrupt+0x60/0x98 <c043db72>
handle_IRQ_event+0x23/0x4c
<c043dc17> __do_IRQ+0x7c/0xd1 <c0405035> do_IRQ+0x63/0x80
=======================
<c04036f2> common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 <c040d556> delay_tsc+0xb/0x13
<c04d8125> __delay+0x9/0xa <e88160bd> R1000_WRITE_GMII_REG+0x36/0x3c
[r1000]
<e8817208> r1000_init_one+0x69f/0x892 [r1000] <c053d851>
__driver_attach+0x0/0x8b
<c04dfc3b> pci_device_probe+0x36/0x57 <c053d78d>
driver_probe_device+0x45/0x9a
<c0419231> __cond_resched+0x17/0x28 <c053d8b4> __driver_attach+0x63/0x8b
<c053d21f> bus_for_each_dev+0x37/0x59 <c053d6ee> driver_attach+0x16/0x18
<c053d851> __driver_attach+0x0/0x8b <c053cf25> bus_add_driver+0x6f/0x10d
<c04dfddf> __pci_register_driver+0x5b/0x7d <c0433a69>
sys_init_module+0x134f/0x14b2
<c0423c25> __mod_timer+0x0/0x94 <c0402cb3> syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Realtek RTL8169/8110 Family Gigabit Ethernet Network Adapter
Driver version:1.04
Released date:2006/07/07
Link Status:Linked
Link Speed:1000Mbps
Duplex mode:Full-Duplex
I/O Base:0xC800(I/O port)
IRQ:11
I am trying to research possible causes of the 'BUG: soft lockup
detected on CPU#0!', but the lines here are causing me nightmares! on
the other hand, there is much more recognition of the card in the final
lines than before the switch to the r1000 driver. If you need the rest
of the dmesg output, please let me know. I tried to parsse it down to
what I thought to be the essentials.
Thanks again for your help!
Steven
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
--
---- Fred Smith -- fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----------------------------
But God demonstrates his own love for us in this:
While we were still sinners,
Christ died for us.
------------------------------- Romans 5:8 (niv) ------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpjYy020DG2e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Procedure to replace a NIC.
- From: Steven Stromer
- Re: Procedure to replace a NIC.
- From: Anne Wilson
- Re: Procedure to replace a NIC.
- From: Steven Stromer
- Re: Procedure to replace a NIC.
- From: Anne Wilson
- Re: Procedure to replace a NIC - PLEASE HELP!
- From: Steven Stromer
- Re: Procedure to replace a NIC - PLEASE HELP!
- From: Robert L Cochran
- Re: Procedure to replace a NIC - PLEASE HELP!
- From: Steven Stromer
- Procedure to replace a NIC.
- Prev by Date: Re: Debian seems to have forked cdrtools
- Next by Date: Re: Procedure to replace a NIC - PLEASE HELP!
- Previous by thread: Re: Procedure to replace a NIC - PLEASE HELP!
- Next by thread: Re: Procedure to replace a NIC - PLEASE HELP!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading