Re: azureus port forwarding problem -- resolved



On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 09:28 -0700, Steven Ellis wrote:
Gerhard Magnus wrote:
I'm trying to set up Azureus using the Stanton Finley installation notes
(http://stanton-finley.net/fedora_core_5_installation_notes.html). I
have 3 linux boxes (192.168.1.11-13) behind a router (192.168.1.1) and a
DSL modem (192.168.0.1). I've followed the instructions for modifying
iptables to open TCP ports 6881-6999 and a single UDP port in that range
-- I've chosen UDP port 6973.

Here's how I've set up port forwarding on the DSL modem and the router:

The DSL Actiontec modem has a "Port Forwarding" page on which I've added
these two lines to the "List of Forwarded Ports", where 192.168.1.1 is
the address of the router:
6881-6999 tcp 192.168.1.1
6973-6973 udp 192.168.1.1

The Linksys router has a "Port Range Forwarding" page on which I've
added these two entries, where 192.168.1.12 is the address of the Linux
box where I want to use Azureus and bittorrent:
6881-6999 tcp 192.168.1.12
6973-6973 udp 192.168.1.12


I guess I'm confused as to how the router and the DSL modem are
connected to your network--If the DSL modem is doing NAT for you, and so
is the router (rather odd, but should work), then you may have things
set correctly, but then the router is using two interfaces, perhaps
192.168.0.X connected to the DSL modem, and 192.168.1.1 connected to the
linux machines--if so, you probably want to have the DSL modem forward
to 192.168.0.X (whatever the router's address is on that subnet)--the
DSL modem likely doesn't know about the 192.168.1.X network.

My network configuration is the "odd" one described above. I changed
the DSL modem port forwarding IP to 192.168.0.3, the address assigned to
the router by its DHCP. Now everything works fine. Thanks for the
help!


I believe that the recommendation is now to _avoid_ using ports 6881 to 6999.
I believe that azureus will only use one
port (for both TCP & UDP), so there is no need to blow big holes in your
firewall. Various ISPs are apparently either rate-limiting (most
likely) or blocking (unlikely??) the old typical bittorrent ports, so
you may just have better luck if you switch to a different
higher-numbered port--make your router and any FC5 iptables firewalling
rules let in the packets for the port that you choose.

port 6973 works fine -- maybe my ISP doesn't see bittorrent as a
problem... yet anyway :}

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is it possible that DSL Modem wont allow remote desktop conne
    ... That DSL Modem is also a router. ... They look like a modem with 1 lan port, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely)
  • Re: Remote desktop only working with one pc
    ... > router or the DSL modem. ... If the test fails then you need to resolve the port ... > its an issue with the DSL modem. ... >> allow remote desktop connections all using different RDP ports (ie 3391, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely)
  • Re: How to Access Any Computer in a LAN by Remote Desktop
    ... >Finding the local port on client ... >is tcp) ... >It's usually telnet'ing to your router and use ... >remote desktop 123.123.123.123:3494 and you will ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • RE: Configure Hardware Firewall for SBS 2003
    ... ports through the hardware firewall / router, do you forward it to the ip ... > hardware router. ... it's not necessary to open this port. ... > TCP 110 This port is used for POP3 mail clients. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: azureus port forwarding problem
    ... DSL modem. ... -- I've chosen UDP port 6973. ... Various ISPs are apparently either rate-limiting or blocking the old typical bittorrent ports, so you may just have better luck if you switch to a different higher-numbered port--make your router and any FC5 iptables firewalling rules let in the packets for the port that you choose. ...
    (Fedora)