Re: smart package mgr question?
- From: Claude Jones <claude_jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:06:36 -0400
On Sat September 30 2006 3:57 pm, Gene Heskett wrote:
My point being that smart didn't show me a cups upgrade at
all, only downgrades, while yumex just got done with 168 megs
of upgrades w/o any apparent problems. Including cups and
friends from whatever to 1.1.2-4.1-1.
I don't usually accept the downgrades when they're offered, but,
I have found those situations useful for other reasons. I'd
still bet some other package was being modified that could only
work by reverting your cups, and it gave you that choice. As to
comparing to Yum, it's almost surely the case that Yum did not
hit the same mirrors as Smart, and even if it did, it did so at
a different point in time. I have found plenty of weirdness with
yum as well, but my general view now is wait - 90% or more of
issues that come up during updating will be fixed by waiting a
while.
--
Claude Jones
Brunswick, Md, USA
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- smart package mgr question?
- From: Gene Heskett
- Re: smart package mgr question?
- From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: smart package mgr question?
- From: Gene Heskett
- smart package mgr question?
- Prev by Date: Re: top posting netiquette
- Next by Date: Re: intel core 2 duo
- Previous by thread: Re: smart package mgr question?
- Next by thread: Problems installing the kernel-devel package with Yum (FC 5)
- Index(es):