Re: fstab and LABEL=
- From: Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:33:09 -0400
At 11:17 AM +0930 10/23/06, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 20:20 -0500, Jay Cliburn wrote:
The ultimate goal is to have your disk show up at /dev/diskX; moving
everything to /dev/sdX is just a temporary step in that direction.
That's only going to be of any good if discX *always* appears as discX,
no matter where it's connected, and no matter what else is also
connected.
This thread has many of the exciting details from both sides of the aisle.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ide&m=115515849926079&w=2
According to that thread, that's the reason to have /dev/disk. Until then,
dev/sd* for everything is going to be a mess, as it's naming is unstable.
--
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:' The Great Writ <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
' is no more. <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- fstab and LABEL=
- From: Mark Haney
- Re: fstab and LABEL=
- From: Tim
- Re: fstab and LABEL=
- From: James Wilkinson
- Re: fstab and LABEL=
- From: Tim
- Re: fstab and LABEL=
- From: Jay Cliburn
- Re: fstab and LABEL=
- From: Tim
- Re: fstab and LABEL=
- From: Ric Moore
- Re: fstab and LABEL=
- From: Jay Cliburn
- Re: fstab and LABEL=
- From: Tim
- fstab and LABEL=
- Prev by Date: Re: fstab and LABEL=
- Next by Date: Re: ntpd and kernel message set_rtc_mmss: can't update
- Previous by thread: Re: fstab and LABEL=
- Next by thread: Re: fstab and LABEL=
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
