Re: NFS, SELinux and firewalls
- From: Anthony Messina <amessina@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:33:15 -0600
Tom Weniger wrote:
Greetings All,as far as the firewall, even though much online docs day that nfs4 does
I have installed FC6 on my home network and am enjoying the new
release. Tip of my fedora to the developers.. Job well done!
What is the status of using NFSv4 with SELinux and firewall enabled? I
have tried to get it going over my home network but to no avail
without disabling SELinux and the firewall. Is this problem strictly a
NFS issue? Has anyone been able to use NFS with SELinux and firewall
enabled?
--
Virtually,
Tom W
not require portmap and that the only port required to be open on the
server is 2049 tcp. my experience with fedora and nfs4 (since fc3 )is
that a connection will fail if port 111 tcp/udp is not opened on the
server. why that is: i don't know. i'm wondering myself.
try the firewall first, with selinux in permissive mode. once you've
established connectivity, check the logs for selinux problems. -a
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- NFS, SELinux and firewalls
- From: Tom Weniger
- NFS, SELinux and firewalls
- Prev by Date: Re: Reading mbox mail on Thunderbird (FC5)
- Next by Date: Re: yum prob on lappy
- Previous by thread: Re: NFS, SELinux and firewalls
- Next by thread: Reading mbox mail on Thunderbird (FC5)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
