Re: Pam issues w/ upgrading mail server from FC3 to FC5
- From: Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:01:11 -0700
Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 21:06 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Craig White wrote:----
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 15:53 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:Yeah, saslauthd is running... the config is unchanged, as above...
Sam Varshavchik wrote:----
Philip Prindeville writes:Ok, well, I'm looking at it:
Since we reimaged our mail server (using Sendmail, Cyrus-imap, Mimedefang,As the message says: pam_stack is deprecated.
and SpamAssassin) to FC5, we've been seeing:
Nov 10 11:13:21 mail saslauthd[2912]: Deprecated pam_stack module called from service "imap"
Nov 10 11:13:21 mail saslauthd[2912]: Deprecated pam_stack module called from service "imap"
Nov 10 11:56:03 mail saslauthd[2912]: Deprecated pam_stack module called from service "imap"
Nov 10 11:56:03 mail saslauthd[2912]: Deprecated pam_stack module called from service "imap"
Nov 10 11:56:03 mail saslauthd[2909]: Deprecated pam_stack module called from service "imap"
in our /var/log/secure logfile. sigh... did I forget to do
something else when setting up the mail server following the
FC5 reimage?
After some further poking: pam_stack has been replaced by the include
directive. See /etc/pam.d
#%PAM-1.0
auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth
account required pam_stack.so service=system-auth
I'm also seeing the contents of the /usr/share/docs/cyrus-imap-*/
directory that references the link:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/FAQ
and looking at that link, they talk about RedHat lagging behind
on the PAM release.
Well, this is more than a bit confusing. It looks like Cyrus
is the one lagging behind... or at least, whoever set the options
that the Redhat RPM's get packaged with did.
What *should* Cyrus be using to authenticate?
This is assuming that I don't want all users having mailboxes to
have entries (accounts) in /etc/passwd... I can seed their passwords
manually using saslpasswd -f /etc/sasldb2 ...
It depends upon setting in /etc/imapd.conf
# grep sasl /etc/imapd.conf
sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd
sasl_mech_list: PLAIN
when cyrus uses saslauthd for authentication...
# cat /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd
# Directory in which to place saslauthd's listening socket, pid file,
and so
# on. This directory must already exist.
SOCKETDIR=/var/run/saslauthd
# Mechanism to use when checking passwords. Run "saslauthd -v" to get a
list
# of which mechanism your installation was compiled with the ablity to
use.
MECH=pam
# Additional flags to pass to saslauthd on the command line. See
saslauthd(8)
# for the list of accepted flags.
FLAGS=
make sure that saslauthd service is started...
/sbin/service saslauthd status
saslauthd (pid 3233 3232 3231 3230 3219) is running...
this should pretty much work.
Craig
I've created a username with:
saslpasswd2 -f /etc/sasldb2 -a imap -c username
Oh, did the "chown cyrus.mail /etc/sasldb2" also...
So I can't figure out what else needs to be done... Still seeing
those messages.
I don't use sasldb but a check of the man page for saslauthd shows...
sasldb (All platforms)
Authenticate against the SASL authentication database. Note that this
is probabally
not what you want to be using, and is even disabled at compile-time by
default.
If you want to use sasldb with the SASL library, you probably want to
use the
pwcheck_method of "auxprop" along with the sasldb auxprop plugin
instead.
Craig
That doesn't seem right.
Why would Cyrus-imapd be released in a successive version that
removed very popular functionality it previously had? A lot of
people use IMAP-over-SSL with a SASL database to authenticate
from.
Usually RPM's are released in binary form with the maximum
amount of functionality.
BTW: saslauthd -v returns:
saslauthd 2.1.21
authentication mechanisms: getpwent kerberos5 pam rimap shadow ldap
-Philip
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pam issues w/ upgrading mail server from FC3 to FC5
- From: Craig White
- Re: Pam issues w/ upgrading mail server from FC3 to FC5
- References:
- Pam issues w/ upgrading mail server from FC3 to FC5
- From: Philip Prindeville
- Re: Pam issues w/ upgrading mail server from FC3 to FC5
- From: Sam Varshavchik
- Re: Pam issues w/ upgrading mail server from FC3 to FC5
- From: Philip Prindeville
- Re: Pam issues w/ upgrading mail server from FC3 to FC5
- From: Craig White
- Re: Pam issues w/ upgrading mail server from FC3 to FC5
- From: Philip Prindeville
- Re: Pam issues w/ upgrading mail server from FC3 to FC5
- From: Craig White
- Pam issues w/ upgrading mail server from FC3 to FC5
- Prev by Date: Re: Format and write to a DVD-RW
- Next by Date: Re: Yum FC6 error
- Previous by thread: Re: Pam issues w/ upgrading mail server from FC3 to FC5
- Next by thread: Re: Pam issues w/ upgrading mail server from FC3 to FC5
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|