Re: Metrics and your privacy

AragonX wrote:

Why not ask at the end of the install of Fedora if it can 'phone home' to
give statistical information? I think if you put in a questionare that

If there is a gratuitous connection action for statistic-collecting purposes, it would be best to ask. But then you lose some information from the people who for whatever reason said no.

Whereas if you collect via yum mirrors, there is a transaction going on initiated by the user that he benefits from. It seems hard for anyone to object to your IP getting used for anonymous aggregated stats in such a case, in fact if I visit any website I expect to have the same done for my visit from their logs (esp if they are on Google Analytics).

It would be cool to generate a GUID per machine and attach it to yum download URLs, eg, http://mirror.org/blah/thing.rpm?GUID=123-123-123.. so it is ignored by the server but is present in the logs. But the logs are still useful without it.

Information is still lost or degraded for

1. Machines that never update at all even once

Making a new machine check for updates at least once as soon as it saw the network was up would be a friendly and non-privacy threatening action that would solve this...

2. Machines that get installed and updated once, and left forever in a working configuration

I think one should just accept that you only caught the install for such machines. Ongoing checking in where the user has not enabled it by yum is a bit ugly.

3. Machines behind a local yum cache

Whatever tools are provided to run the yum cache should have the repo log processing stuff folded into them, and report stats up to Fedora HQ by default. But a user should be able to turn it off.

4. Hand-updated boxes

People might have servers in production that they don't dare yum. Maybe they yum one development box and then bring over the working RPMs by hand to the other servers. Not much to be done there.

-Andy

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 1058 and 1030 errors revisited
    ... Are you sure about the symptoms ie when the11th or 12th user logs ... Does the issue occour only on some machines? ... We have four servers to ... There are about sixty client ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.group_policy)
  • Re: 5.3 and HT with SMP
    ... there was no logs and no errors. ... The servers are on a ... Solaris runs on these machines for months. ... This bios is right up to date....so unless there is some fix out that has ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Advanced Program Property greyed out
    ... other option is 'Run once for every user who logs on' which seems to create ... schedule reboots of servers at specific times. ... >> I created a program that I want to be able to rerun on machines whether ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.swdist)
  • Re: WINS and the 03 filewall
    ... > We are in the process of trying to change out our old 2K WINS servers with ... My plan was to set up the new '03 machines, ... I've reviewed the logs and there doesn't seem ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • WINS and the 03 filewall
    ... We are in the process of trying to change out our old 2K WINS servers with ... My plan was to set up the new '03 machines, ... I've reviewed the logs and there doesn't seem to be ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)