Re: Thuderbird as an Evolution replacement ? (Evolution things...)
- From: Tom Horsley <tomhorsley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:34:02 -0500
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:15:26 -0700
Kim Lux <lux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I installed Thunderbird on a friends Windows PC the other day and it
looked pretty spiffy. How does it compare to Evolution ? Is it robust
enough to handle really large email archives ?
Don't know about large mailboxes, but I tried Sylpheed-claws (its
in extras) and liked it better than any of the other mailers
I've tried so far. (I especially like that it won't display html
mail unless I go to a lot of trouble to install an html plugin,
which I haven't done since I don't want to see that crap,
and especially don't want to inform the spammers that I
opened their mail because the html referenced some external link :-).
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: KVM and Xen
- Next by Date: Re: How to determine what partition is still not formatted?
- Previous by thread: Re: Thuderbird as an Evolution replacement ? (Evolution things...)
- Next by thread: Re: Thuderbird as an Evolution replacement ? (Evolution things...)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
