Re: Question for Gene Heskett about slow Firefox launch
- From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 05:53:52 -0500
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 01:36, Ric Moore wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 00:22 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 11:58, John Wendel wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
In the thread "Re: How NSA access was built into Windows"
I believe you will have to build a generic kernel.org kernel
configured without that support, something I have underway right now,
using 2.6.20-rc4. I was amazed at the number of options I found
turned on that a proper 'make oldconfig' should absolutely never have
turned on. My scripts take care of everything but grub.conf for a
kernel install, so when its done all I should have to do is reboot
since I'm already running 2.6.20-rc4. Several things I found may
even account for the apparent slowness of later kernels. Things
like 15 seconds to launch firefox on an xp-2800 athlon with a gig of
ram?
Gene,
Could you share some of these "Several things I found"? I'm having
the same problem with slow firefox launching on a very similar
system. I'm currently running vanilla kernel 2.6.19.2.
Thanks,
John
Basicly I did a make xconfig in the kernel tree I had already built
and was running, with an eye to getting rid of that which isn't of any
perceived usefullness to me. If, as you go thru the xconfig screens
item by item, you read the help that pops into the lower right corner
of the window, and it says "if you don't know what this option does,
you probably don't need it, say N". By the time I got down to the
bottom of 'block devices' I'll bet I'd turned off a hundred things
that were being built, and which had no earthly use to me, but the
previous 'make oldconfig' had enabled them. With this newer compiler
seemingly being as slow as it it, that cut the build time by about 7
minutes, down to 24 IIRC, but I can recall building a kernel for this
machine in under 8 minutes back in the mists of time. And the system,
once booted to it, does seem a bit snappier at some operations. I
think I can probably cut that much more the next time I have half an
hour to work in an xconfig window.
Firefox launch times? Not a huge speedup there so far. Sorry.
Are you going to try to disable SElinux in the kernel and see what
happens?? Ric
Already did, Ric. Logwatch has a bunch of complaints from pam but things
are working. It indicated some sort of disappointment over a cron
started amanda backup session, but the session itself ran as usual.
--
================================================
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/
http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar
http://www.wayward4now.net
================================================
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2007 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Question for Gene Heskett about slow Firefox launch
- From: John Wendel
- Re: Question for Gene Heskett about slow Firefox launch
- From: Gene Heskett
- Re: Question for Gene Heskett about slow Firefox launch
- From: Ric Moore
- Question for Gene Heskett about slow Firefox launch
- Prev by Date: Re: How NSA access was built into Windows
- Next by Date: Re: Question for Gene Heskett about slow Firefox launch
- Previous by thread: Re: Question for Gene Heskett about slow Firefox launch
- Next by thread: Re: Question for Gene Heskett about slow Firefox launch
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|