Re: How NSA access was built into Windows

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:24 -0800, David Boles wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 18 January 2007 12:04, Ric Moore wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:12 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
You are absolutely right about the applications being compiled for
libselinux. I tested this the hard way by ripping it out with rpm -ev
--nodeps. Basically it hosed the system; the box would not even boot
anymore. Kernel panic reared it's head early on in the boot process.
You're a good man Lyvim, thank you for giving it a go, now the rest of
us learned by your experience! :) Ric
Yes, please add my thanks to the chorus too.

How long have you paranoid SELinux bashers been using Fedora Core? SELinux has
been in Fedora Core at least since FC-3 and I think that I remember it in
FC-2. So whatever it is that you don't want the world to see it could have
already seen. ;-)

So Selinux Question=Stupid. Yeah, got it.


Wrote the filter but forgot to make it active active. It is now.

Do I think that your SELinux questions are stupid? No I don't. But if you
really wanted reliable information, instead of 'I am not sure' or 'I think' or
'It might do' or just plain FUD answers you should have asked them on the
fedora-selinux-list.


Google is your friend. If any of you would have spent a small part of the
time researching what SELinux really does and why it does it, as you have
bashing it incorrectly for what it does not do, this conversation would have
ended long ago.

Haven't seen much bashing, but I have seen alot of questions being
bandied about. But whatever cracks your chestnuts.


Nor have I seen anyone that actually has made the effort to research this
instead of tossing FUD all over the place. A simple Google search for selinux
turns up many pages of information. You really should try that.

- --

David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFFr99UAO0wNI1X4QERAiFrAKDCyYH6gK62WMNkLyNpkotHmF6UpgCgoHVZ
4Y09UREEOKFph5M9ClqZ320=
=i5gE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Next Fedora Release
    ... Hash: SHA1 ... In my opinion Fedora Core is precisely ... > the right place for a project like selinux. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Firefox Acroread plugin not working
    ... much committment Adobe has in supporting linux. ... Acrobat Reader that worked without problems for Fedora Core 4. ... SELinux changed the rules after Acrobat Reader 7 was released. ... and the fix did eventually come from here, ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Firefox Acroread plugin not working
    ... much committment Adobe has in supporting linux. ... Acrobat Reader that worked without problems for Fedora Core 4. ... SELinux changed the rules after Acrobat Reader 7 was released. ... and the fix did eventually come from here, ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Firefox Acroread plugin not working
    ... much committment Adobe has in supporting linux. ... Acrobat Reader that worked without problems for Fedora Core 4. ... SELinux changed the rules after Acrobat Reader 7 was released. ... and the fix did eventually come from here, ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: How NSA access was built into Windows
    ... I tested this the hard way by ripping it out with rpm -ev ... Kernel panic reared it's head early on in the boot process. ... How long have you paranoid SELinux bashers been using Fedora Core? ...
    (Fedora)