Re: Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects
- From: "Dotan Cohen" <dotancohen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:15:47 +0200
On 01/03/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
> Oh? And how is one to know that? Where is that mentioned in the
> documentation?
Many places in the wiki, installation guide, announcements, discussions
in this list etc.
I apologize then. My ignorance is at fault.
> If I choose to install KDE, or foobar for that matter, can I be
> certain that 2 disks is enough? Or will I find myself stuck in the
> middle of an install, after I wiped the harddrive of a working XP
> install, and have no way of downloading more disks?
As I already indicated, if you select non-default packages you might
have to use additional disks
There is a default? In every installation the user is prompted to
choose his software. I suppose that just clicking "ok" without reading
or changing anything is default. I'm not a default kind of guy :)
>> 2) Fedora 7 Test versions already provide single Live CD's with the
>> ability to install to hard disk. The general release would have it too
>
> Excellent. I was unaware of that. That will improve the situation
> dramatically.
I already told you in a previous post on the same thread. Your reply on
that indicated that you hadnt read it.
I'm rereading the posts, I don't see where that was mentioned.
>> 3) Single CD's are not useful for the folks with limited bandwidth
>> connnections. They can download alternative spins like the "Prime" and
>> "Everything" versions.
>
> And multiple-disk downloads are not useful for those with limited disk
> to waste, time to spare, and/or patience. I term those people "end
> users".
Sure. Like I said in my earlier post, having a single CD does not fit
the requirements of many end users which is why you should not argue
that only a single CD be provided. Package size as well as numbers are
constantly increasing in the Fedora repositories. A single CD is bound
to become less and less useful over time as a result. Fedora 7 will
provide multiple variations to fit into the different needs better.
As it should be.
> Rahul, if I could help I would. I'm not a CS major, just a silly
> Mechanical Engineering student. Many of the usability problems that I
> encounter with Linux, not specifically Fedora, is that all computer
> users are assumed to be software engineers. We're not. Sorry.
You do not need to be a CS major to participate. You can help in
documentation, bug reports, triaging and so on very easily. Take a look
at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/HelpWanted. Arguing on this list
changes nothing.
I'm familiar with the page. I have filed bugs in the past, I'll get
myself back into the habit. Usability bugs, especially, I can comment
on.
Thanks.
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com/what_is/client.html
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Re: Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects
- From: Ingemar Nilsson
- Re: Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects
- From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects
- From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects
- Prev by Date: Re: MMS streams
- Next by Date: Re: What is the proper way to restart udev?
- Previous by thread: Re: Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects
- Next by thread: Re: Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|