Re: recommendation for a 64bit laptop



On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Alan Cox wrote:

Also keep an eye on the videochip/GPU that the laptop is equipped with.
Compiz or Beryl only work well with nVidia GPUs, older ATI GPUs (I think

The Nvidia requires a huge great binary driver which means you won't get
any support from anyone but Nvidia (because only they have all the code).
The earlier ATI is well supported (R200 etc), the R300 is despite ATI,
and latest ATI is not supported at all (even 2D) properly because ATI are
actively blocking it.

They also have an interesting habit of dropping support for chipsets without telling anyone. The 97xx dropped support of the 440go chipset and there was no mention of it in the readme or on the website. (Which is what I have in my laptop.)

up to and including the R400 family) and (I think) Intel GPUs. If you

The intel stuff just works which has something to do with the fact Intel
employee/contract with people to make sure this happens and their staff
includes various X developers.

Keith Packard being one of them.

Not speaking for my employer here but personally, right now I'd recommend
the Intel setup for a quiet life and for just about anything but heavy
gaming. The 3945 wireless requires a little bit of fiddling as its not
entirely free software yet but that is all being fixed right now.

The hard part here is the desire for 64bit. Intel seems to have made it as difficult as possible to determine if a processor is 64-bit or not.

At some point I need to replace my 3 year old laptop to something that will last another three years. It looks like it is going to be as difficult now as it was when I bought the last one.

Another issue with the Intel chipset is that you cannot just go out and buy an Intel video card. It has to be on the motherboard or an OEMed card that came in the machine. (Onboard video usually gets disabled by anyone who wants performance because they use "shared" memory in most cases. Even worse is when they pad out dedicated ram with shared memory, which can cause striping effects on output.)

So far there are no real good options for video. If you get the video card with open source drivers, you are limited in what processor you can use and what motherboard you can buy. For some hardware configurations, you have no open source options if you want fast graphics or hardware acceleration.

It bites but it bytes.

--
"Invoking the supernatural can explain anything, and hence explains nothing."
- University of Utah bioengineering professor Gregory Clark

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list



Relevant Pages

  • Re: ATI or NVIDIA ?
    ... > Video Card to get. ... > Their driver support for linux is just so-so ... ... > But I have not used ATI, since I had an ATI card in a Notebook ... > drivers for ANY kind of linux and home build kernels ... ...
    (comp.os.linux.setup)
  • Re: State of 3d video, which vendor has best support?
    ... is that I can't find out if I should choose a 3D chipset from Intel, Ati, ... What's the state of support, track record, and such for these ... nVidia support is good w/ the binary driver on i386. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: [opensuse] How to install Google Earth?
    ... I confess I have no idea how to determine what kind of video card I ... It seems that on that link there are only ATI and NVIDIA ... is how i got the info that I have an intel 965 express chipset. ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: Nvidia Update - Thanks
    ... To ATI, it's the same thing. ... > The old NVDVD codec is a different product then the NVIDIA DVD Decoder ... >>> By the, I contacted, Intel developer support labs, and according to ... >>> everything is correct and also according to intel, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter)
  • Re: DO NOT BUY FROM ZTGROUP!
    ... I do see how a company that has poor tech support can be related to ... support in the MCE realm ... ... Again - the only company to use the eHome Wonder also has poor customer ... ZTGroup = Only OEM to use ATI eHome Wonder ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter)