Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:28:17 -0500
Tomas Larsson wrote:
are connected.
So I simly don't buy that you get infected first time you
You don't today - or you don't see it because the viruses are more stealthy and designed to spread slowly and remain undetected while permitting remote control of the machines to send spam or participate in an occasional DDOS attack. A few years back an unprotected, unpatched box would be hit by something in a couple of minutes on a random internet address. The 2003 slammer worm was probably the most dramatic of the bunch, practically knocking out the internet. It sent UDP packets out of RAM as fast as the machine could generate them.
Well, obviously I have missed it, Been on the net since mid 90's, before
Win95, using 3.11 and on DSL since end 90's.
Allways been using AW-SW though, currently NAW.
So I wonder, Why has not any of my boxes ever been infected since it is said
to be so easy to infect Windows.
Well, the answer is, I think, It is not so easy, unless you are very very
very stupid.
Unfortunately there is a lot of people out there that is very very very very
stupid, just take look on all these scams, nigeria letters etc.
Are saying these guys are stupid?
http://www.itnews.com.au/newsstory.aspx?CIaNID=49857
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Tomas Larsson
- RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- References:
- Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Arne Chr. Jorgensen
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Claude Jones
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Anne Wilson
- RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Tomas Larsson
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell
- RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Tomas Larsson
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell
- RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Tomas Larsson
- Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- Prev by Date: Really, REALLY slow computer
- Next by Date: Re: On making mistakes (Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat)
- Previous by thread: RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- Next by thread: RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|