RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: "Tomas Larsson" <tomas@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:13:28 +0200
-----Original Message-----
From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 5:28 PM
To: tomas@xxxxxxx; For users of Fedora
Subject: Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
Tomas Larsson wrote:
participateare connected.
So I simly don't buy that you get infected first time you
You don't today - or you don't see it because the viruses are more
stealthy and designed to spread slowly and remain undetected while
permitting remote control of the machines to send spam or
minutes on ain an occasional DDOS attack. A few years back an unprotected,
unpatched box would be hit by something in a couple of
probably the mostrandom internet address. The 2003 slammer worm was
could generatedramatic of the bunch, practically knocking out the internet.
It sent UDP packets out of RAM as fast as the machine
since itthem.
Well, obviously I have missed it, Been on the net since mid 90's,
before Win95, using 3.11 and on DSL since end 90's.
Allways been using AW-SW though, currently NAW.
So I wonder, Why has not any of my boxes ever been infected
is said to be so easy to infect Windows.are very
Well, the answer is, I think, It is not so easy, unless you
very very stupid.nigeria letters etc.
Unfortunately there is a lot of people out there that is very very
very very stupid, just take look on all these scams,
Are saying these guys are stupid?
http://www.itnews.com.au/newsstory.aspx?CIaNID=49857
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
I'm not saying that Windows by any means are safer than other OS, but its
not more un-safe either.
Obviously since there is more systems out there, compared to Linux, there
ought to be more problem's.
What I'm saying that any-one that runs an unprotected computer despite all
media coverage is stupid, he or she cannot blame the OS if he or she opens a
virusinfected mail.
The same goes for installing software that in best case is unstable and in
worst case.....
People seems to blame everything on the OS, when they buy some cheap noname
addon-cards with drivers that makes an havoc in the system.
Obviously that does not happen in the LINUX world, basically because those
no-name manufacturers does not target the linux community and subsequently
there is no drivers, and you don't install it, hence no problems.
Obviously there must be flaws in any OS/SW even Linux, as an example my
FC4-server was rooted, due to a flaw in php/MySQL.
I ended up with a complete re-install, if it was a windows-system, first of
all, it wouldn't probably happen, since my AW would have taken care of it,
plus the fact that I would have managed to remove it without re-installing,
So in a sence Linux is far much more complicated to restore, compared to
Windows XP.
With best regards
Tomas Larsson
Sweden
http://www.tlec.se
http://www.ebaman.com
Excellent and cheap hosting, use http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust23962
Verus Amicus Est Tamquam Alter Idem
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Zoltan Boszormenyi
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- References:
- Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Arne Chr. Jorgensen
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Claude Jones
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Anne Wilson
- RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Tomas Larsson
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell
- RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Tomas Larsson
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell
- RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Tomas Larsson
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell
- Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- Prev by Date: Re: Saving more than two kernels
- Next by Date: Re: Saving more than two kernels
- Previous by thread: Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- Next by thread: Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|