Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:30:24 -0500
Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
Why? What would the advantages be? Do they overcome the drawbacks ofHow?He was a bit tricky toHow should rpm handle it? Rpm has no way of knowing why the
use chattr +i on /bin/login and some other progs.
BTW, although rpm complained that it cannot replace
those, why isn't it prepared for such scenarios?
RPM is made for Linux, it should certainly know
about special filesystem flags and handle them.
1. be able to specify special flags in the specfile and apply them upon
install
2. detect if the filesystem doesn't handle such specials and make note
of it in the rpmdb
3. clear them before uninstalling or upgrading
4. detect if it was modified, report it with rpmv
(skip this check if the rpmdb indicates it, see 2)
rpm being able to change a file that you set the immutable flag on?
Mikkel
Yes, see 3.
What would be the point of having a special attribute if programs
can just ignore it?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Zoltan Boszormenyi
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- References:
- Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Arne Chr. Jorgensen
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Claude Jones
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Anne Wilson
- RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Tomas Larsson
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell
- RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Tomas Larsson
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell
- RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Tomas Larsson
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Les Mikesell
- RE: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Tomas Larsson
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Zoltan Boszormenyi
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Stuart Sears
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Zoltan Boszormenyi
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Zoltan Boszormenyi
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- From: Zoltan Boszormenyi
- Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- Prev by Date: Re: (no subject)
- Next by Date: FC6 (&7) netboot
- Previous by thread: Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- Next by thread: Re: Why most run Microsoft, not RedHat
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|