RE: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
- From: "Ada Ho" <ada_ho2003@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:44:36 -0700
Ok. In response to Dave's request for different points of view: here's one:
do something incredible: it has created a truly "public" good withoutFrom the economic point of view, the free software community has managed to
government intervention. Not only that, it has shown the world that the
market model of exchanging ideas as services (software) directly works
better than either socialist intervention model or the
free-market-as-monetary-exchange model. Why? Because people are exchanging
software with each other directly without having to go through the monetary
middleman of vendors or the government middleman of bureaucracy. In essence,
technology has made possible a return to direct barter (I'll give you an
emacs for a virtual machine...). But to make this possible on a global
scale, so that maximum benefit is achieved, the "market" model of free
software has to be truly open- so that it can be accessed by anyone who has
a potential "exchange" of services or ideas - and the cost of doing this is
what economists call the "Free Rider" problem - people who gain benefits
from the open exchange without giving anything in return.
Lynn Margulis, the biologist, likes to point out that bacteria freely
exchange their genes in a global network. One could hardly say that bacteria
do this "altruistically" (could a bacterium be altruistic?) Rather, they do
it because it offers a survival advantage - in economic terms, it's a
good/service.
It's good to know that the human species is catching up to bacteria by means
of the internet and the free software movement.
So don't dispair when "Free Riders" gripe about what they're getting from
the free software "marketplace". They only do it because they've long since
adapted to being passive, helpless consumers or wards of the state. The
value to the world gained by free software is far greater than that taken
away by "Free Riders". If things don't work perfectly sometimes, it's
because the open "marketplace" is fostering progress - and change.
John Aberdeen
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of David Fletcher
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 1:45 PM
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 20:28, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Yep. If half of the people who are willing to discuss the nature of
Fedora in length step further to actually contribute that would make a
pretty big difference but alas folks are more interested in calling it
unstable or wanting the distribution to including proprietary software
by default.
Next time you want to complain ask yourself how much you have
contributed in anyway at all to a every growing collection of Free
software included in a distribution that you can get for free. That
includes a lot of work many of which is volunteer driven in maintaining
around 8000 packages, documentation, artwork, QA, release engineering,
infrastructure, marketing etc.
You can choose to help.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join
Rahul
Yes I've been making complaints earlier today, but I have also made a
(small)
contribution to documentation and will be happy to contribute again when I
see something I think needs to be addressed.
The way I see it, Free and Open Source Software is a massive act of altruism
performed by many people for the good of the worldwide community. Users of
FOSS should recognise this fact and be sure to give at least something back
to the community in return, even if it isn't a contribution to the operating
system they use for free. Many computer users don't have the skills to write
code or the time available due to family commitments etc to write
documentation, but everybody can find time to go along to, say, a blood
donation session or spend a few hours sometimes helping a charity, thus
putting something back into the community.
Is this a reasonable opinion? I don't mind if the list disagrees, but I
would
be interested in reading some points of view from others.
Dave
--
Registered Linux user number 393408
I use and recommend the email service at 1 & 1
For domain registration, email and web hosting please visit:
http://oneandone.co.uk/xml/init?k_id=6389763
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
- From: Ric Moore
- RE: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
- References:
- Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
- From: David Fletcher
- Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
- Prev by Date: Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
- Next by Date: fc7 test 4 live login
- Previous by thread: Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
- Next by thread: RE: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|