CentOS vs stability: req a Fedora / RHEL perspective
- From: Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:03:12 -0400
I'm setting up a server with CentOS (well, a test server (a Qemu VM), a
main server, and a backup server (both Xen slices)), one each with CentOS
4.4, 4.5, and 5.0, and it all works. It's also one more version of CentOS
than I was expecting, as the test server got suddenly upgraded to CentOS
4.5 during a 200 MB update. I then found the FAQ that explained that
CentOS does this a few times a year, and that the old point releases are
archives that won't receive any more updates; that is, to get security
updates one has to accept all the updates and version upgrades. This isn't
quite what I expected for a "stable" OS; rather it's more like Fedora (6),
which also just got a large update.
Does RHEL work this way also? Or does RH provide security updates for,
e.g., RHEL 4.4 now that 4.5 is out?
Am I just missing something? I'm new to setting up and maintaining servers.
--
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CentOS vs stability: req a Fedora / RHEL perspective
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: CentOS vs stability: req a Fedora / RHEL perspective
- Prev by Date: Re: real basic wireless access question!!
- Next by Date: Sprint Novatel Ovation U720 USB phone very slow on Fedora
- Previous by thread: harddrive error message in fedora6
- Next by thread: Re: CentOS vs stability: req a Fedora / RHEL perspective
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|