Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Aaron Konstam <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:20:34 -0500
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 19:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Aaron Konstam wrote:You are ducking the question. The question is why you stuck with Fedorae
But it is time that someone admits the mistake was calling the
distribution f7 in the first place. As someone pointed out googling for
f7 is a nightmare, etc.
Distribution is officially called Fedora 7. So if there is any mistake
in calling it f7 that lies solely with the users.
dora
Rahul
7 rather than Fedora Core seven, which eliminate the confusion. The
reason that the nature of Core had changed is sort of inadequate.
Anyway, it has been done so we are just going to have to let it rest.
--
=======================================================================
I have a very good DENTAL PLAN. Thank you.
=======================================================================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Michael Schwendt
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- References:
- fc7 should be f7
- From: Martin Marques
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Todd Zullinger
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Eric
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Benjamin Lewis
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Martin Marques
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Jim Cornette
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Aaron Konstam
- Re: fc7 should be f7
- From: Rahul Sundaram
- fc7 should be f7
- Prev by Date: Re: MP3 player fails to mount. [SOLVED]
- Next by Date: OT: The optimal time to buy RAM
- Previous by thread: Re: fc7 should be f7
- Next by thread: Re: fc7 should be f7
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
