RE: Can Linux beat XP in homes yet or NOT?

Tim:
Secondly, please tell me how you manage to get XP running in half an
hour. It takes far longer than half an hour on all the PCs I've seen to
prep the drive and install the software. Never mind what comes after
the first boot of the barebones system.

Knute Johnson:
Lot's of practice reloading it :-). I've had to load it many times
for work and you get pretty good at it after a while.

LOL! I actually meant the hardware speed, though, not the user speed.
Even just hitting enter and letting it do its defaults without me making
any decisions, takes it longer than that.

I'd make jokes, too, about how often one has to install one versus the
other, but then I'm one of the few that only ever installed my Windows
about three times. I just didn't keep on breaking it like many do. ;-)

As for Linux, I can't get F7 to run on my mail server and it's clone.
It just won't boot. I'm SOL. I'm going to have to buy a new
computer for my mail server or go back to a Windows system like
Mercury.

I've been lucky that I haven't really had a great deal of trouble
loading Linux on my machines, except for a couple of quite old boxes. I
managed it in the end, though.

You might consider CentOS. I'd suggest something, like it, with a
longer lifespan than Fedora for a server. Re-installing servers is a
bigger pain than desktop boxes.

If I had unlimited time I think I might try playing with BSD. It
should run on my old mail server computers.

I had a brief play with BSD to see what it was like. It was a bit too
different for me to do much with it, I'd need more spare time, and more
interest to bother.

I'm a little hesitent at mixing systems between server and client. I
want things like NFS to work smoothly between them all. Running
disparate versions of NFS isn't always easy. I left my server running
on FC4 as all other boxes (FC 4, 5, 6 & 7) can talk with it.
Conversely, I've had a few firewall headaches trying to use NFS between
boxes using later versions.

I need to change my server, but I'm not looking forward to the
mailserver changeover. There's some thirty-thousand e-mails in my
account that I don't want to stuff up.

--
[tim@bigblack ~]$ rm -rfd /*^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Huname -ipr
2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 i686 i386

Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7.

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.



--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: New Event Log Errors!
    ... Somehow along those lines I'd also installed the Certificate Authority ... Did you apply the last Server Pack for SBS Server? ... Please install Windows Support Tools on the win2k3 sp1 problematic ... Microsoft is providing this information only as a convenience to you: ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: {Disarmed} Re: problems w/ net (http) install
    ... I believe that using NFS, you would want to serve out the ISO and not ... installation and http server base for installation. ... NFS isn't strictly off the table, but the system hosting this install ... Nope the packages aren't big ones, fairly standard, 1MB-ish packages, ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Cannot activate SBS 2003 SP2
    ... everywhere and sitting on the case of the server is the old board - balanced ... slip stream SBS you would have had it ages ago. ... My main reason for slipstreaming the install is because I cannot get ... updates that need to be applied if one is to have a succesful outcome ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Cannot activate SBS 2003 SP2
    ... everywhere and sitting on the case of the server is the old board - balanced ... slip stream SBS you would have had it ages ago. ... My main reason for slipstreaming the install is because I cannot get ... updates that need to be applied if one is to have a succesful outcome ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Cannot activate SBS 2003 SP2
    ... the old array was a raid 5 that should not have become so rooted but the twit who built the server did not actually enable the spare drive to act as a spare!! ... The problem is SBS is unique and I've rarely if ever seen it work. ... The server has been chugging away in a small business environment for several years and I have administered it for them for about a year making sure that the updates were installed and their mailboxes were managed etc etc. ... My main reason for slipstreaming the install is because I cannot get the original 2003 server install to cope with the new hardware and it falls over part way into the install - BSOD bit. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)