Re: F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
- From: Timothy Murphy <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:14:04 +0100
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
If a developer makes a change which prevents the software workingYou would have a valid point if you were running RHEL or one of the
with some hardware it previously worked with,
I think the onus is on the developer to warn the user of this.
clones like centos. By definition, some changes in Fedora are going
to break things for some people.
As far as I can judge from my reading of newsgroups and mailing lists,
CentOS is neither more nor less reliable than Fedora.
Very few software errors arise because some developer
is trying something daring.
99% of problems occur simply because someone makes a silly blunder,
and that is just as likely to happen anywhere.
I find this "Fedora is bleeding edge" excuse rather absurd.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
- From: antonio montagnani
- Re: F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
- From: Bob Goodwin
- Re: F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
- From: antonio montagnani
- Re: F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
- From: Bob Goodwin
- Re: F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
- From: antonio montagnani
- Re: F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
- From: Chris Jones
- Re: F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
- From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
- From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
- F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
- Prev by Date: Re: Back Again
- Next by Date: Re: Back Again
- Previous by thread: Re: F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
- Next by thread: Re: F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|