Re: The case against LVM
- From: Terry Polzin <foxec208@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:23:19 -0400
On Tuesday July 31 2007, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I've been using LVM on one computer for some time,Definitely an asset when connected to a SAN.
without any real problems.
However, I've decided that it causes unnecessary complications,
as some applications do not seem to accept the LVM devices,
while I don't find any real advantages to compensate.
I thought it would simplify changing the sizes of partitions,
but as it happens I never need to do this
with today's enormous disks.
I wonder if that is the general experience?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The case against LVM
- From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: The case against LVM
- Prev by Date: Re: scrambled panel & x-session loss: another update
- Next by Date: Re: evolution paper size
- Previous by thread: Re: scrambled panel & x-session loss: another update
- Next by thread: Re: The case against LVM
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|