Re: The case against LVM

Terry Polzin wrote:

I've been using LVM on one computer for some time,
without any real problems.

However, I've decided that it causes unnecessary complications,
as some applications do not seem to accept the LVM devices,
while I don't find any real advantages to compensate.

I wonder if that is the general experience?

Definitely an asset when connected to a SAN.

Why, as a matter of interest?


--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The case against LVM
    ... without any real problems. ... However, I've decided that it causes unnecessary complications, ... as some applications do not seem to accept the LVM devices, ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: The case against LVM
    ... without any real problems. ... However, I've decided that it causes unnecessary complications, ... as some applications do not seem to accept the LVM devices, ...
    (Fedora)
  • The case against LVM
    ... I've been using LVM on one computer for some time, ... without any real problems. ... However, I've decided that it causes unnecessary complications, ... as some applications do not seem to accept the LVM devices, ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: The case against LVM
    ... However, I've decided that it causes unnecessary complications, ... as some applications do not seem to accept the LVM devices, ... I regularly move free space between different partition. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: The case against LVM
    ... Timothy Murphy wrote: ... without any real problems. ... However, I've decided that it causes unnecessary complications, ... as some applications do not seem to accept the LVM devices, ...
    (Fedora)