Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:44:53 +0100
It's transparent unless it breaks. I do the same as you advise here,
throw out LVM at install time. All the machines here are laptops with
only Fedora as the bootable OS, and everything but /boot in one /
partition, so LVM is a completely senseless default.
LVM is great.. for big server boxes with many users and unknown usage
requirements. I turn it off. I'd rather a single disk was straight
partitions (eg a laptop) and anything else gets two disks with striped
MD0 swap and mirrored MD1 file systems. IDE disks are just too unreliable
for anything but mirroring
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- References:
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- From: ke5c
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- From: Andy Green
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- Prev by Date: Re: Torrent Freeze
- Next by Date: Re: DD not working
- Previous by thread: Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- Next by thread: Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|