Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:50:42 -0500
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
dd should not use lots of CPU time. The bottleneck is disk access
speed. Depending on the drivers used, and some tweaking, the system
may be spending a lot of time in the disk driver routines doing
basically nothing.
CPU use will depend on your disk controller. IDE controllers have a lot of CPU overhead for seeks/positioning even if DMA is used for the data transfer - that's why people still use SCSI for busy servers.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- References:
- DD not working
- From: Karl Larsen
- Re: DD not working
- From: Vivek J. Patankar
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Karl Larsen
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Jacques B.
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Karl Larsen
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Jacques B.
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
- DD not working
- Prev by Date: RE: Linux suitable motherboard/µprocessor?
- Next by Date: Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- Previous by thread: Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- Next by thread: Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- Index(es):