Re: OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ?
- From: Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:20:01 -0500
Chris Jones wrote:
Yes, I tried that but it didn't seem to make as much difference as I had hoped it would...
What exactly is your need? Contact me off-list and maybe I can
help. Have you profiled your code? I have found that people
often do not actually know where their code is spending its
time. I once sped up an app which was universally acknowledged
to be slow "because it uses floating point." I sped it up 3x.
I modified the parsing routines it used, not the floating point.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ?
- From: Chris Jones
- Re: OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ?
- References:
- OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ?
- From: Chris Jones
- Re: OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ?
- From: Rex Dieter
- Re: OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ?
- From: Chris Jones
- OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ?
- Next by Date: Re: Linux suitable motherboard/µprocessor?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ?
- Next by thread: Re: OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ?
- Index(es):