Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- From: Rick Stevens <rstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:32:29 -0700
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 12:21 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Care to elaborate on that last statement? Are you talking about the disks
themselves or the IDE interface or ???? If "IDE" disks are unreliable then
what disks are reliable?
The disks themselves. I've yet to meet a reliable disk, ever year or two
one dies on me.
Do you leave them spinning all the time or spin them up and down?
We don't have issues like that, but we never shut down our servers
except when we must perform maintenance. It's the spinup-spindown-
spinup cycles that kill the bearings (heat up, cool down, heat up
again).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Principal Engineer rstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxx -
- CDN Systems, Internap, Inc. http://www.internap.com -
- -
- What is a "free" gift? Aren't all gifts free? -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- From: ke5c
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- From: Andy Green
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- Prev by Date: Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- Next by Date: Re: Specifying tmp for tar
- Previous by thread: Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- Next by thread: Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|