Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:14:39 +0100
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:50:42 -0500
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
dd should not use lots of CPU time. The bottleneck is disk access
speed. Depending on the drivers used, and some tweaking, the system
may be spending a lot of time in the disk driver routines doing
basically nothing.
CPU use will depend on your disk controller. IDE controllers have a lot
of CPU overhead for seeks/positioning even if DMA is used for the data
transfer - that's why people still use SCSI for busy servers.
Thankfully no longer true as of SATA providing your controller does AHCI
or similar and the drives support NCQ
Alan
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- DD not working
- From: Karl Larsen
- Re: DD not working
- From: Vivek J. Patankar
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Karl Larsen
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Jacques B.
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Karl Larsen
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Jacques B.
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- From: Les Mikesell
- DD not working
- Prev by Date: Re: KDE ssh-agent
- Next by Date: Re: Torrent Freeze
- Previous by thread: Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- Next by thread: Re: DD not working--SUCCESS!
- Index(es):