Re: Setting up a file server for a diskless X-Terminal
- From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:42:41 +0100
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
I'd expect much better performance with the ltsp approach (running only
X on the client with the desktop and apps on the faster machine) than
you would have running the 2nd machine as a workstation with everything
mounted via NFS.
Another way to come at a "Diskless" machine nowadays is just to install
Fedora on a USB stick (2GB will do fine) and use a common network
filesystem. That significantly reduces what is expected of the server
box down to just pushing files around on demand.
Updating the USB images could be a drawback if you have many boxes, but
if you have a network /home and no client-specific data on the stick,
you can just nuke the sticks with a new image now and then. There's a
bunch of ways to split the client-local -ness of the deal with the server.
With the "dual-channel" USB sticks the general client performance is
really good at no cost to the server.
-Andy
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Setting up a file server for a diskless X-Terminal
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Setting up a file server for a diskless X-Terminal
- References:
- Setting up a file server for a diskless X-Terminal
- From: Derek Tattersall
- Re: Setting up a file server for a diskless X-Terminal
- From: Craig White
- Re: Setting up a file server for a diskless X-Terminal
- From: Derek Tattersall
- Re: Setting up a file server for a diskless X-Terminal
- From: Les Mikesell
- Setting up a file server for a diskless X-Terminal
- Prev by Date: Re: Need help reading ms.pst file.
- Next by Date: Re: WSJ: Mossberg takes the Linux bait and snarls ....
- Previous by thread: Re: Setting up a file server for a diskless X-Terminal
- Next by thread: Re: Setting up a file server for a diskless X-Terminal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|