Re: F8 ETA?



Paul Lemmons wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: F8 ETA?
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10/30/2007 03:16 PM
> <snip>
I wish fedoralegacy hadn't gone from support forever to no support, two years is often enough to update production machines! I really like FC better than Ubuntu, and RHEL/WhiteBox/CentOS are just a little too slow to offer features.

Agreed, many production servers have a long upgrade requirement. Lets define "production server" though. In particular, it is a *server* not a *workstation*. It chugs along every day doing what it did the day before. Not much excitement or need for new features for the poor lonely server. It is happiest in a stable, working, static environment.



You need to define "production" too. A software developer might have a different view from that of a provider of online financial services. The former might thin Fedora 8 the ideal server offering for its production work, simply because it needs the latest features to develop and test against. Someone targetting RHEL6 should be using F8, if not today, then certainly tomorrow.



--

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

Please do not reply off-list

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list



Relevant Pages

  • Re: test environment windows 2003
    ... an authorative restore after the demote and system state restore. ... This document was prepared for the building of a copy of the production ... Remove the physical cable for the new pc and build the member server ... Master Operation roles (FSMO and the File Replication service). ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: 2003 AD R2 schema upgrade from Win 2000 Server?
    ... until we have at least one R2 server up and running in each of the three ... then add them as the production schedule permits. ... trying to remind me that the new R2 features can't be installed on the ... to a stop at its site, in order to do the schema upgrades. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: Homegrown synchronization
    ... copying the zip file sitting there on the server to ... It is a filecopy of the zipped backend file from the server to the ... with the server whose SyncApp zips ups the production backend file ...
    (microsoft.public.access.replication)
  • RE: how analyze malfunctioning asp.net application?
    ... a product server, correct? ... unhealthy and teh worker process will be recycled. ... production debugging in your environment. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance)
  • Re: ISA/VPN difficulty
    ... W2K/ISA/VPN server and replacing it. ... The current one (production) works fine in terms of ISA and VPN ... The new machine does everything fine EXCEPT allow clients to do ...
    (microsoft.public.isa.vpn)