Re: pulseaudio == disaster ??
- From: Tom Horsley <tom.horsley@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:06:29 -0500
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:55:09 -0700
Karl Larsen <k5di@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This pulseaudio and Selinux are a
real pair of cases. I have yet to see any advantage to either.
Actually, even though I turned it off I can see advantages to
pulseaudio - for instance I use freenx to connect to systems
at work, and it is probably possible (though I've never had
enough use for it to figure it out) to get the audio
as well as the screen contents back to my remote location.
Selinux also has an advantage - it allows you to check the box
on government contracts that says your operating system has
enhanced security (other than that, it is of no value
whatsoever :-).
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- pulseaudio == disaster ??
- From: David A. De Graaf
- Re: pulseaudio == disaster ??
- From: Tom Horsley
- Re: pulseaudio == disaster ??
- From: Karl Larsen
- pulseaudio == disaster ??
- Prev by Date: Resume after hibernate pesters me for WAP password
- Next by Date: RE: looking for suggestions
- Previous by thread: Re: pulseaudio == disaster ??
- Next by thread: Re: pulseaudio == disaster ??
- Index(es):