Re: Fedora and Ubuntu
- From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <mikkel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:22:48 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
Aaron Konstam wrote:Is this what you are talking about?
I have both Ubuntu and Fedora installed. The update services are
different but in no way
is the Ubuntu system significantly better or faster.
The big difference in the way it feels is that apt-get caches the
repository info until you tell it to update it, where yum does this slow
step on every operation even if it was just done seconds earlier.
metadata_expire
Time (in seconds) after which the metadata will expire. So that
if the current metadata downloaded is less than this many seconds
old then yum will not update the metadata against the repository.
If you find that yum is not downloading information on updates as
often as you would like lower the value of this option.
Mikkel
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Fedora and Ubuntu
- From: Karl Larsen
- Re: Fedora and Ubuntu
- From: Aaron Konstam
- Re: Fedora and Ubuntu
- From: Les Mikesell
- Fedora and Ubuntu
- Prev by Date: Re: Solar Calendar
- Next by Date: Re: I miss smbfs: cifs doesn't work as expected
- Previous by thread: Re: Fedora and Ubuntu
- Next by thread: Re: Fedora and Ubuntu
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|