Re: Is ECC memory any use?
- From: Les <hlhowell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:49:25 -0800
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 04:45 -0500, Chris Snook wrote:
Timothy Murphy wrote:You are assuming that only data resides in the memory, which is not the
I'm getting memory for a very old (P2B-LS) Asus motherboard,
and I see I can get ECC memory for some 20% more.
Is there any point in getting this?
I see there is quite a lot of work
in getting ECC testing incorporated into the Linux kernel.
But even if it were there, would it be very valuable?
I have a feeling that disk errors are far more likely
than RAM errors.
Is that right?
Depends who's buying. Few people do anything on "personal" systems that really
justifies ECC RAM, though I'm sure the exceptions are probably on this list. If
you're doing any kind of business work where uptime is important, or any kind of
technical work where bit flips could cause nasty side effects, it's probably
worth buying the ECC, unless you're doing high-end graphics where a stray pixel
won't make a difference and most of your power budget is going to the GPUs.
-- Chris
case. Your program will act quite strangely if bits flip as well. ECC
has been dropped by some manufacturers because it is cheaper. Some
other forms of systems have an alternative scheme, but I prefer ECC.
That said, my current system doesn't have it because I misread the spec.
Bits do not typically "flip occasionally". As memory ages, a "feature"
of CMOS is something that creates bridges internal to the silicon. This
in turn causes failures. If you are lucky, the bit that fails will
match what is written to it. In which case no failure shows up. On the
other hand a bit that has a bridge can change state, and if you wrote a
0 to a bit that would bridge to a 1, then you will find that a program
can run for a while, then FLIP! and it doesn't work. You will get an
error message that will probably not say anything about a bit flipping,
and worse, it will not be repeatable because programs are dynamically
loaded, data is paged in and out, and memory is occasionally shifted
(depending on the OS means of optimizing memory access, and the language
or OS means of garbage collection). ECC memory means your programs will
work because your system can recover from these "single bit errors".
Note that very few ECC systems will correct multibit errors.
If you have too many failures in code running, with strange and non
repeatable conditions, you should begin to suspect memory errors,
whether or not you have ECC memory.
Regards,
Les Howell
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is ECC memory any use?
- From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Is ECC memory any use?
- References:
- Is ECC memory any use?
- From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: Is ECC memory any use?
- From: Chris Snook
- Is ECC memory any use?
- Prev by Date: Re: Yum bungling dependency resolution
- Next by Date: Elisa Mediacenter doesnt start
- Previous by thread: Re: Is ECC memory any use?
- Next by thread: Re: Is ECC memory any use?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|