Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe

Aaron Konstam:
We already determined that 192.168.1.6 is not the machine's address,

Tim:
I don't recall seeing a message stating what was the true cause of the
rejection.

Aaron Konstam:
When the OP ran service network restart
it would not restart getting an error that that ip address was already
in use. That means to me that the ip address could not be asigned to the
machine in question.

To the *interface* in question... But anyway, I've already read that,
and it doesn't really address the first two quoted paragraphs above your
reply (the "why" and a proper "resolution").

By the way, who's crappy client made the subject line go "Re: Re: Re:"?

--
[tim@bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr
2.6.23.1-10.fc7 i686 i386

Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7.

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.



--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Relevant Pages

  • : F8 Network Woe
    ... rejection. ... Aaron Konstam: ... it would not restart getting an error that that ip address was already ... not solved the originall question but the problem has been circumvented ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: A sneak peek at Fedora 9
    ... Aaron Konstam: ... Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. ... I read messages from the public lists. ...
    (Fedora)