Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:48:17 +0900
Tim wrote:
Aaron Konstam:We already determined that 192.168.1.6 is not the machine's address,
Tim:I don't recall seeing a message stating what was the true cause of the
rejection.
Aaron Konstam:
Tim, I wish you wouldn't do that. Email clients (I'm using seamonkey, but others do it too) can display messages in threads, so one can see who said what in response to whom.
Your montage replies stuff that up(-:
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Tim
- Re: F8 Network Woe
- References:
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: mike cloaked
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Jonathan Allen
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Aaron Konstam
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Jonathan Allen
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Aaron Konstam
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Jonathan Allen
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Tim
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Aaron Konstam
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Tim
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Aaron Konstam
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Tim
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Aaron Konstam
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- From: Tim
- Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- Prev by Date: Re: USB storage devices and /etc/fstab
- Next by Date: Re: Cups problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: Re: F8 Network Woe
- Next by thread: Re: F8 Network Woe
- Index(es):